Jhonny Pinto v. Finishmaster, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Jhonny Pinto
Defendant: Finishmaster, Inc. and Does 1-20, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2018cv10773
Filed: December 31, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Cormac J Carney
Referring Judge: Alka Sagar
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 26, 2019 Filing 18 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Clerk, Los Angeles Superior Court. (iv)
February 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND #11 by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Plaintiff's motion to remand is GRANTED. The Court hereby REMANDS this case to Los Angeles County Superior Court. MD JS-6. Case Terminated. (iv)
February 25, 2019 Filing 16 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Courtney L. Burks to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Finishmaster, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-23268012) filed by Defendant Finishmaster, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Certificate of the Clerk of the Supreme Court of Arizona, #2 Affidavit Minnesota Supreme Court Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Proposed Order on Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case Pro Hac Vice) (Sommerfeld, Amanda)
February 22, 2019 Filing 15 Response to Order to Show Cause filed by Plaintiff Jhonny Pinto re: Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, Set/Reset Deadlines, #14 (Perez, Carlos)
February 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHETHER PLAINTIFF SEEKS TO RECOVER EMOTIONAL DISTRESS DAMAGES, PUNITIVE DAMAGES, AND ATTORNEYS FEES THAT EXCEED THE AMOUNT-IN-CONTROVERSY REQUIREMENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney. The Court hereby ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause as to whether he does or does not seek to recover more than $75,000. Plaintiff's written response to this order to show cause is due by Monday, February 25, 2019 at 12 noon. (iv)
February 18, 2019 Filing 13 REPLY in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #11 filed by Plaintiff Jhonny Pinto. (Perez, Carlos)
February 11, 2019 Filing 12 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #11 filed by Defendant Finishmaster, Inc.. (Sommerfeld, Amanda)
January 30, 2019 Filing 11 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Jhonny Pinto. Motion set for hearing on 3/4/2019 at 01:30 PM before Judge Cormac J. Carney. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Remanding Action to State Court) (Perez, Carlos)
January 25, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE OF INTENT upon filing of the complaint by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Scheduling order to be issued on March 20, 2019. (gga)
January 14, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm to Judge Cormac J. Carney for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:18-cv-10773 CJC(ASx). (rn)
January 11, 2019 Filing 8 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Defendant Finishmaster, Inc.. (Morrison, Scott)
January 11, 2019 Filing 7 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jhonny Pinto, identifying Jhonny Pinto, Plaintiff; Jace H. Kim, Esq., Plaintiff's Attorney; and Carlos A. Perez, Esq., Plaintiff's Attorney. (Perez, Carlos)
January 11, 2019 Filing 6 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiff Jhonny Pinto. (Attorney Carlos Andres Perez added to party Jhonny Pinto(pty:pla))(Perez, Carlos)
January 3, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Finishmaster, Inc., identifying Uni-Select, Inc.. (Morrison, Scott)
January 3, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (et)
January 3, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (Attachments: #1 CV11- Statement of Consent) (et)
December 31, 2018 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Finishmaster, Inc., Does 1 through 20, inclusive. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Jhonny Pinto. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 11/13/2018 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT 1 TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 . (et)
December 31, 2018 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Finishmaster, Inc., Does 1 through 20 inclusive amending Complaint -, filed by Plaintiff Jhonny Pinto [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 11/19/2018 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT 6 TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 .(et)
December 31, 2018 NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Defendant Finishmaster, Inc. [SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT 10 TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 .(et)
December 31, 2018 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Finishmaster, Inc.. (Sommerfeld, Amanda)
December 31, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 18STCV04593 Receipt No: 0973-22970976 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Finishmaster, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Original Complaint, #2 Exhibit Notice of Case Assignment, #3 Exhibit Summons, #4 Exhibit Notice of Case Management Conference, #5 Exhibit First Amended Summons, #6 Exhibit First Amended Complaint, #7 Exhibit Civil Case Cover Sheet, #8 Exhibit Proof of Service, #9 Exhibit Voluntary ADR Packet, #10 Exhibit Answer and Proof of Service, #11 Exhibit Notice to Adverse Party of Removal, #12 Declaration Goldbach Declaration) (Attorney Amanda C Sommerfeld added to party Finishmaster, Inc.(pty:dft))(Sommerfeld, Amanda)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jhonny Pinto v. Finishmaster, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Finishmaster, Inc.
Represented By: Amanda C Sommerfeld
Represented By: Courtney L Burks
Represented By: Scott Morrison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-20, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jhonny Pinto
Represented By: Matias N Castro
Represented By: Carlos Andres Perez
Represented By: Jae Hyun Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?