Peter R. Tia v. Core Civic et al
Peter R. Tia |
HCCF Lt. Baker, WTDF employee Mark Staggs, Any others similaly situated, Core Civic, Hawaii Prisoner John Knight, HCCF Inmate, Lt. Baker and CCA Inc. |
2:2018cv10788 |
December 31, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Alka Sagar |
Otis D Wright |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER DENYING REQUEST for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee #2 . Case is DISMISSED immediately by Judge Otis D. Wright, II MD JS-6, Case Terminated. (lc) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and referred to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (esa) |
Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Peter R. Tia. (esa) |
Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against defendants Any others similarly situated, Baker(in individual capacity), Baker(in official capacity), Baker(HCF in Hawaii employee retired in official capacity), Baker(HCF in Hawaii employee retired in individual capacity), Core Civic, HCCF Inmate, John Knight, Mark Staggs(in official capacity), Mark Staggs(in individual capacity) pursuant to 42 USC 1983pr. Case assigned to Judge Otis D. Wright, II and referred to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar, filed by plaintiff Peter R. Tia. (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.