The National Coalition of Association of 7-Eleven Franchisees v. 7-Eleven, Inc., A Texas Corporation

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District The National Coalition of Association of 7-Eleven Franchisees v. 7-Eleven, Inc., A Texas Corporation

The National Coalition of Association of 7-Eleven Franchisees v. 7-Eleven, Inc., A Texas Corporation

Plaintiff:	The National Coalition of Association of 7-Eleven Franchisees
Defendant:	7-Eleven, Inc., a Texas corporation
Case Number:	2:2018mc00026
Filed:	February 26, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Steve Kim
Presiding Judge:	John F. Walter
Nature of Suit:	Other

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 3, 2018	Filing 34 ORDER DISMISSING MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. Plaintiff moves to quash a subpoena from an action that has since been dismissed in its entirety. See Case No. 17cv7454, ECF No. 134. Because termination of an action voids any underlying subpoenas and moots any litigation regarding those subpoenas, the subpoena at issue in the motion is void and the motion is therefore moot. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(a)(1)(A)(ii), (a)(2) In re Apollo Grp., Inc. Sec. Litig., 329 Fed. Appx 283, 284 (D.C. Cir. 2009). THEREFORE, it is ORDERED that the Motion to Quash Subpoena is dismissed as moot. In re: MOTION to Quash MOTION for Protective Order 1 . (Case Terminated. Made JS-6) (clee)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 3, 2018

Filing 34 ORDER DISMISSING MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. Plaintiff moves to quash a subpoena from an action that has since been dismissed in its entirety. See Case No. 17cv7454, ECF No. 134. Because termination of an action voids any underlying subpoenas and moots any litigation regarding those subpoenas, the subpoena at issue in the motion is void and the motion is therefore moot. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(a)(1)(A)(ii), (a)(2) In re Apollo Grp., Inc. Sec. Litig., 329 Fed. Appx 283, 284 (D.C. Cir. 2009). THEREFORE, it is ORDERED that the Motion to Quash Subpoena is dismissed as moot. In re: MOTION to Quash MOTION for Protective Order 1 . (Case Terminated. Made JS-6) (clee)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: The National Coalition of Association of 7-Eleven Franchisees v. 7-Eleven, Inc., A Texas Corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: 7-Eleven, Inc., a Texas corporation
Represented By:	Christopher M Odell
Represented By:	James F Speyer
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: The National Coalition of Association of 7-Eleven Franchisees
Represented By:	R Brent Cooper
Represented By:	Tarron L Gartner-Ilai
Represented By:	Mandeep S Rupal
Represented By:	Gordon K Wright
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?