Federal Trade Commission et al v. Marcus et al
| State of Florida and Federal Trade Commission |
| Paralegal Support Group, LLC, Yisbet Segrea, 16 S H Street Lake Worth, LLC;, Jeremy Lee Marcus, Craig Davis Smith, 17866 Lake Azure Way Boca, LLC, Nantucket Cove of Illinois, LLC, Discount Marketing USA S.A., Guardian LG, LLC, Associated Administrative Services, LLC, Jack Marcus, US Legal Club, LLC, 110 Glouchester St., LLC, White Light Media LLC, 72 SE 6th Ave., LLC, Instahelp America, Inc., 1609 Belmont Place LLC, Viking Management Services LLC, JLMJP Pompano, LLC, James Marcus, Active Debt Solutions, LLC, Fast Pace 69 LLC, Omni Management Partners LLC, Halfpay International, LLC, American Credit Security, LLC, 321Loans, Inc., 114 Southwest 2nd Street DBF, Halfpay NV LLC, Cockburn and Associate LLC, Teresa Duda, Financial Freedom National, Inc., Helping America Group, LLC, Strategic Acquisitions Two, LLC, HP Media, Inc. and Breeze Financial Solutions, Inc. |
| Jonathan Perlman |
| 2:2018mc00040 |
| March 28, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Unassigned |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 RESPONSE filed by Pro Hac Vice attorney Ryann Flack on behalf of Plaintiff State of Florida. RE: Notice of Filing Fee Due. PHV fee N/A. Attorney will not be appearing as attorney of record on this case and will be removed pursuant to G109 Notice. (lt) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE filed by Pro Hac Vice attorney Valerie M Verduce on behalf of Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission. RE: Notice of Filing Fee Due. PHV fee N/A. Attorney will not be appearing as attorney of record on this case and will be removed pursuant to G109 Notice. (lt) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Ronnie Adili. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Ryann Flack. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Angeleque P Linville. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Valerie M. Verduce. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER from USDC Southern District of Florida. (ghap) |
| Filing 1 MISCELLANEOUS CASE COMPLAINT Re: 17-60907-civ from Southern District of Florida., filed by plaintiffs State of Florida, Federal Trade Commission. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheets) (ghap) Modified on 3/30/2018 (ghap). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
