Brooks Sports, Inc. v. Anta China Co., Ltd.
Plaintiff: Brooks Sports, Inc.
Defendant: Anta (China) Co., Ltd. and Anta China Co., Ltd.
Case Number: 2:2018mc00116
Filed: August 31, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Steve Kim
Referring Judge: S James Otero
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 10, 2018 Filing 8 TEXT-ONLY ENTRY - RECEIVED Notice of Receipt of Electronic Case Transfer from Eastern District of Virginia, 1:18-mc-00031 filed 9/10/2018. (iv)
September 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF BROOKS SPORTS, INC.'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO TRANSFER MISCELLANEOUS CASE TO THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA #1 by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. Original file, certified copy of the transfer order and docket sheet sent electronically. (see order for details) (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (Attachments: #1 Transmittal Letter) (hr)
September 5, 2018 Filing 6 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Brooks Sports, Inc., re Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #4 served on Sept. 5, 2018. (Lo, Jason)
September 5, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE OF HEARING on Motion Related to a Subpoena from Another District by Clerk of Court. Counsel is hereby notified that the MISC - Motion Related to Subpoena from Another District, #1 is set for hearing. Motion set for hearing on 10/3/2018 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (car) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
September 4, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge S. James Otero and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (car)
August 31, 2018 Filing 3 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Brooks Sports, Inc., re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #2 , MISC - Motion Related to Subpoena from Another District, #1 served on Aug. 31, 2018. (Lo, Jason)
August 31, 2018 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Brooks Sports, Inc., identifying Brooks Sports, Inc.. (Lo, Jason)
August 31, 2018 Filing 1 MOTION RELATED TO A SUBPOENA FROM ANOTHER DISTRICT Receipt No: 0973-22353187 - Fee: $47, filed by Plaintiff Brooks Sports, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Jason Lo, #2 Exhibit 1, Lo Declaration, #3 Proposed Order) (Attorney Jason C Lo added to party Brooks Sports, Inc.(pty:bkmov))(Lo, Jason)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brooks Sports, Inc. v. Anta China Co., Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brooks Sports, Inc.
Represented By: Jason C Lo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anta (China) Co., Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anta China Co., Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?