Kim Nelson v. Harris Corporation, et al
Plaintiff: Kim Nelson
Defendant: Harris Corporation and Does 1-50, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2019cv00029
Filed: January 3, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: R Gary Klausner
Referring Judge: Suzanne H Segal
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 3, 2019 Filing 7 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Defendant Harris Corporation. (Beldner, Sabrina)
January 3, 2019 Filing 6 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (hr)
January 3, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (esa)
January 3, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Harris Corporation. Related Case(s): No Related Cases (Beldner, Sabrina)
January 3, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Harris Corporation, (Beldner, Sabrina)
January 3, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Harris Corporation. (Beldner, Sabrina)
January 3, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 18STCV05774 Receipt No: 0973-22981198 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Harris Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I) (Attorney Sabrina A Beldner added to party Harris Corporation(pty:dft))(Beldner, Sabrina)
January 3, 2019 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does 1-50, inclusive, Harris Corporation, Jury Demand, filed by plaintiff Kim Nelson. (Filed in state court 11/19/18, submitted as document 1, attachment 1) (esa)
January 3, 2019 CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by defendant Harris Corporation. (Filed in state court 12/31/18, submitted as document 1, attachment 8)(esa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kim Nelson v. Harris Corporation, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Harris Corporation
Represented By: Kerri Sakaue
Represented By: Sabrina A Beldner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-50, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kim Nelson
Represented By: Donald James Aaron Brock
Represented By: Timothy J Gonzales
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?