In Re Verity Health System of California, Inc.
| Verity Health System of California, Inc. |
| County of Santa Clara |
| Xavier Becerra |
| 2:2019cv00133 |
| January 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERRAL OF APPEAL (ADVERSARY) prepared by the United States Bankruptcy Court on 1/7/2019. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE REGARDING APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. The appeal has been assigned to Judge Dolly M. Gee. Refer to the Notice for specifics. (ghap) |
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF APPEAL AND STATEMENT OF ELECTION : Re: Order (A) Authorizing the Sale of Certain of the Debtors' Assets to Santa Clara County Free and CLear of Liens, Claims, Enbumbranced, and others interests; (B) Approving the Assumption and Assignment of an unexpired Lease Related Thereto; and (C) Granting Related Relief entered on 12/27/2018 by Bankruptcy Judge Ernest M Robles, filed in the Bankruptcy Court on 1/7/2019. Bankruptcy Court case number: 2:18-bk-20151-ER, Adversary number: N/A, BAP case number: N/A., filed by appellant Xavier Becerra. (Attachments: #1 BK Court Docket Sheets) (ghap)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
