Margaret J. Jones v. The United States of America
| Margaret J Jones |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and The United States of America |
| 2:2019cv00173 |
| January 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| James V Selna |
| Taxes |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to The United States of America answer now due 4/15/2019, filed by Defendant The United States of America.(Attorney Andrew Pribe added to party The United States of America(pty:dft))(Pribe, Andrew) |
Filing 12
Order Setting Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference set for 4/8/2019 at 11:30 AM before Judge James V. Selna. Counsel shall file their Joint Rule 26 Meeting Report, with a completed Exhibit A, by 4/1/2019. (kt)
|
| Filing 11 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Justin Michael Fontaine counsel for Plaintiff Margaret J Jones. Adding Justin Michael Fontaine as counsel of record for Margaret J. Jones, as Executor, Estate of Jeffrey L. Jones for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by plaintiff Margaret J. Jones. (Attorney Justin Michael Fontaine added to party Margaret J Jones(pty:pla))(Fontaine, Justin) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Margaret J Jones, upon Defendant The United States of America served on 1/14/2019, answer due 3/15/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Janice Micheaux, Legal Department. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to via U.S. Mail. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to via U.S. Mail. Service was executed in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service to Attorney General of the United States and Internal Revenue Service)(Walton, Edward) |
| Filing 9 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA. (jlen) |
| Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant The United States of America. (es) |
| Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons, #6 filed by Plaintiff Margaret J Jones. (Walton, Edward) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #3 . The following error(s) was found: The date and signature line must be left blank. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Margaret J Jones, (Walton, Edward) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by Plaintiff Margaret J Jones. (Walton, Edward) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Margaret J Jones. (Walton, Edward) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23009804 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Margaret J Jones. (Attorney Edward C Walton added to party Margaret J Jones(pty:pla))(Walton, Edward) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
