Darnell Shiver v. Ally Financial et al
| Darnell Shiver |
| Ally Financial and Experian |
| 2:2019cv00189 |
| January 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Gail J Standish |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (lh) |
| Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Darnell Shiver, re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 served on 1/9/2019. (lh) |
| Filing 4 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Darnell Shiver. (lh) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Darnell Shiver. (lh) |
| Filing 2 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendants Ally Financial, Experian. (lh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Ally Financial, Experian. Case assigned to Judge David O. Carter for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (Filing Fee $ 400 Paid) Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Darnell Shiver. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
