Harold Meza et al v. 3M Company et al
| Harold Meza and Barbara Meza |
| The Boeing Company, United Technologies Corporation, BASF Catalysts LLC, Ingersoll-Rand Company, Industrial Holdings Corporation, 3M Company, BASF Corporation, Does 1-850, inclusive, General Electric Company, Certain-Teed Corporation, Wyeth Holdings LLC, Arkema, Inc., John Crane Inc., The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, Cytec Industries Inc., Crown Cork and Seal Company, Inc., Rohr Inc., CBS Corporation, Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, Cirrus Enterprises LLC, Soco West, Inc., Wyeth Holdings Corporation, Shell Oil Company, Union Carbide Corporation, Kelly Moore Paint Company Inc., Henkel Corporation, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, American Cynamid Company, Viacom, Inc., Rohr Inc. doing business as Goodrich Aerospace and The Carborundum Company |
| 2:2019cv00334 |
| January 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Steve Kim |
| P.I. : Asbestos |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1442 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 87 Receipt of Copy of Remand Transmittal Letter from Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. 18STCV07768, acknowledged on 9/10/2019. (iv) |
| Filing 86 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles County Superior Court. (lom) |
Filing 85
ORDER REMANDING ACTION TO STATE COURT ON STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES #84 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Case remanded to Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case number 18STCV07768. Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (lom)
|
| Filing 84 STIPULATION to Remand Case to State Court filed by Plaintiff Barbara Meza, Harold Meza. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Foley, Crystal) |
| Filing 83 NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AS TO THE BOEING COMPANY filed by PLAINTIFF Barbara Meza, Harold Meza. (Foley, Crystal) |
|
Filing 82
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY #81 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. The Court orders that all claims against defendant THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY in the Complaint of Harold Meza andBarbara Meza, bearing Civil Action No. 19-cv-00334-MWF (SKx) are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41. Pursuant to stipulation, the parties shall bear their own costs. (lom)
|
| Filing 81 STIPULATION to Dismiss defendant The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company filed by Defendant The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Stipulation for Dismissal of The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company)(Uchida, David) |
| Filing 80 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant United Technologies Corporation, re Notice of Settlement #79 of Action as to UTC only served on August 29, 2019. (Garratt, Justin) |
| Filing 79 NOTICE of Settlement of Action as to UTC only filed by Defendant United Technologies Corporation. (Garratt, Justin) |
| Filing 78 SCHEDULING NOTICE ADVANCING HEARING TIME ONLY by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. On the Court's own motion, the Motion to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #35 set for September 9, 2019 is ADVANCED TO 9:00 AM. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rs) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
|
Filing 77
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION CONTINUING HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR REMAND AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE #76 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. The hearing on Plaintiffs' motion for remand continued until September 9, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. The Scheduling Conference continued to September 16, 2019 at 11:00 a.m. (iv)
|
| Filing 76 Third STIPULATION to Continue PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR REMAND AND SCHEDULING CONFERNCE from July 15, 2019 and August 12, 2019 to August 19, 2019 and September 16, 2019 filed by Plaintiff Barbara Meza, Harold Meza. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Foley, Crystal) |
| Filing 75 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Henkel Corporation (Baravarian, Tina) |
| Filing 74 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery),, filed by Defendant Henkel Corporation.(Attorney Tina Ladan Baravarian added to party Henkel Corporation(pty:dft))(Baravarian, Tina) |
|
Filing 73
ORDER TO DISMISS COMPLAINT AS TO DEFENDANT SHELL OIL COMPANY WITHOUT PREJUDICE #72 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. IT IS SO ORDERED that plaintiffs' complaint, as to defendant SHELL OIL COMPANY only, is dismissed without prejudice. Each party to bear its own costs. (lom)
|
| Filing 72 STIPULATION to Dismiss Defendant Shell Oil Company filed by Defendant Shell Oil Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Petty, Ross) |
|
Filing 71
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION CONTINUING HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR REMAND AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE #70 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. The hearing on Plaintiffs' motion for remand continued until July 15, 2019, at 10:00 a.m.; The Scheduling Conference continued to August 12, 2019, at 11:00 a.m. (iv)
|
| Filing 70 Second STIPULATION to Continue PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR REMAND AND SCHEDULING CONFERNCE from April 15, 2019 and May 8, 2019 to July 15, 2019 and August 12, 2019 filed by Plaintiff Barbara Meza, Harold Meza. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Foley, Crystal) |
| Filing 69 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Stipulation for Protective Order #66 . The document is stricken. The parties are directed to file a correct document that complies with Judge Kim's sample protective order. Refer to Judge Kim's Procedures and Schedules. (yl) |
| Filing 68 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Stipulation for Protective Order #66 . The following error(s) was/were found: Stipulation for Protective Order does not comply with material provisions of the sample protective order located in Judge Kim's Procedures & Schedules page.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (yl) |
|
Filing 67
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: DEFENDANT THE BOEING COMPANYS ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CLOSE COURTROOM #65 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. The Motion is DENIED. (iv)
|
| Filing 66 [*STRICKEN PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER DE 69*] Joint STIPULATION for Protective Order filed by Defendant The Boeing Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL AND EXPORT-CONTROLLED MATERIALS)(Young, Kristi) Modified on 4/8/2019 (yl). |
| Filing 65 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Order for TO CLOSE COURTROOM filed by Defendant The Boeing Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration OF KRISTI L.K. YOUNG IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT THE BOEING COMPANYS ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CLOSE COURTROOM, #2 Proposed Order GRANTING DEFENDANT THE BOEING COMPANYS ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CLOSE COURTROOM) (Young, Kristi) |
| Filing 64 REPLY IN SUPPORT OF NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #35 filed by Plaintiffs Barbara Meza, Harold Meza. (Foley, Crystal) |
| Filing 63 NOTICE of Change of address by John R Lawless, Jr attorney for Defendant Wyeth Holdings LLC. Changing attorneys address to 633 West 5th Street, Suite 1600 Los Angeles, CA 90071. Filed by Defendant Wyeth Holdings LLC. (Lawless, John) |
|
Filing 62
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION CONTINUING HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR REMAND AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE #61 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. The hearing on Plaintiffs' motion for remand presently set for April 1, 2019 is continued until April 15, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. The Scheduling Conference presently set for April 1, 2019 is continued to May 8, 2019 at 11:00 a.m. (iv)
|
| Filing 61 STIPULATION to Continue Plaintiffs' Motion for Remand and Scheduling Conference from April 1, 2019 and April 1, 2019 to April 15, 2019 and May 8, 2019 filed by Plaintiff Barbara Meza, Harold Meza. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Foley, Crystal) |
| Filing 60 SEALED DOCUMENT Declaration of Richard Shimamoto re Objection/Opposition (Motion related),,,,, #52 , Order on Motion for Leave to File Document Under Seal, #58 filed by Defendant The Boeing Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, Part 1 of 5, #2 Exhibit 1, Part 2 of 5, #3 Exhibit 1, Part 3 of 5, #4 Exhibit 1, Part 4 of 5, #5 Exhibit 1, Part 5 of 5, #6 Exhibit 2, #7 Exhibit 3, Part 1 of 5, #8 Exhibit 3, Part 2 of 5, #9 Exhibit 3, Part 3 of 5, #10 Exhibit 3, Part 4 of 5, #11 Exhibit 3, Part 5 of 5, #12 Exhibit 4, Part 1 of 6, #13 Exhibit 4, Part 2 of 6, #14 Exhibit 4, Part 3 of 6, #15 Exhibit 4, Part 4 of 6, #16 Exhibit 4, Part 5 of 6, #17 Exhibit 4, Part 6 of 6, #18 Exhibit 5, Part 1 of 2, #19 Exhibit 5, Part 2 of 2, #20 Exhibit 6, Part 1 of 2, #21 Exhibit 6, Part 2 of 2, #22 Exhibit 7, #23 Exhibit 8, #24 Exhibit 9, #25 Exhibit 10, #26 Exhibit 11, #27 Exhibit 12, #28 Exhibit 13, #29 Exhibit 14, #30 Exhibit 15, #31 Exhibit 16, #32 Exhibit 17, #33 Exhibit 18, #34 Exhibit 19, #35 Exhibit 20, #36 Exhibit 21, #37 Exhibit 22, #38 Exhibit 23, #39 Exhibit 24, #40 Exhibit 25, #41 Exhibit 26, #42 Exhibit 27, #43 Exhibit 28)(Young, Kristi) |
| Filing 59 SEALED DOCUMENT Declaration of Nolan Leatherman and designated exhibits re Objection/Opposition (Motion related),,,,, #52 , Order on Motion for Leave to File Document Under Seal, #58 filed by Defendant The Boeing Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 4, Part 1 of 3, #3 Exhibit 4, Part 2 of 3, #4 Exhibit 4, Part 3 of 3, #5 Exhibit 5)(Young, Kristi) |
|
Filing 58
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: DEFENDANT THE BOEING COMPANYS APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL #49 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. The Application is GRANTED. Boeing may file Exhibits 1 and 4 5 to the Declaration of Nolan Leatherman; Exhibits 1, 46, 810, 1723, and 2526 to the Declaration of Richard Shimamoto; and the two corresponding declarations under seal. (iv)
|
| Filing 57 INITIAL DISCLOSURE filed by Defendant Cirrus Enterprises LLC (Hartley, Edward) |
| Filing 56 NOTICE OF REFILING EXHIBIT L TO THE DECLARATION OF THOMAS F. MCCAFFERY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANYS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND filed by Defendant The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company. [Dct 53-17] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit L)(Uchida, David) |
| Filing 55 NOTICE OF FILING EXHIBIT K TO THE DECLARATION OF THOMAS F. MCCAFFERY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANYS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND filed by Defendant The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company. [DKT 53-5] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Uchida, David) |
| Filing 54 DISCLOSURE of Rohr, Inc.'s Initial Disclosure filed by Defendant Rohr Inc. (Glaspy, David) |
| Filing 53 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #35 filed by Defendant The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration David M. Uchida, #2 Exhibit "A", #3 Exhibit "B", #4 Exhibit "C", #5 Declaration Thomas M. McCaffery, #6 Exhibit "A", #7 Exhibit "B", #8 Exhibit "C" (1of2), #9 Exhibit "C" (2of2), #10 Exhibit "D", #11 Exhibit "E", #12 Exhibit "F", #13 Exhibit "G", #14 Exhibit "H", #15 Exhibit "I", #16 Exhibit "J", #17 Exhibit "L")(Uchida, David) |
| Filing 52 DEFENDANT THE BOEING COMPANYS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR REMAND Opposition re: APPLICATION to file document Declarations and designated exhibits under seal #49 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #35 Opposition filed by Defendant The Boeing Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Kristi Young ISO Boeing's Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand, #2 Declaration of McCaffery ISO Boeing's Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Reman, #3 Exhibit A to McCaffery Declaration, #4 Exhibit B-Part 1 of 2 to McCaffery Declaration, #5 Exhibit B-Part 2 of 2 to McCaffery Declaration, #6 Exhibit s C and D to McCaffery Declaration, #7 Exhibit E to McCaffery Declaration, #8 Exhibit F to McCaffery Declaration, #9 Exhibit G to McCaffery Declaration, #10 Exhibit H Part 1 of 2 to McCaffery Declaration, #11 Exhibit H Part 2 of 2 to McCaffery Declaration, #12 Exhibit I - Part 1 of 3 to McCaffery Declaration, #13 Exhibit I - Part 2 of 3 to McCaffery Declaration, #14 Exhibit I - Part 3 of 3 to McCaffery Declaration, #15 Exhibit J - Part 1 of 2 to McCaffery Declaration, #16 Exhibit J - Part 2 of 2 to McCaffery Declaration, #17 Exhibit K - Part 1 of 2 to McCaffery Declaration, #18 Exhibit K - Part 2 of 2 to McCaffery Declaration, #19 Exhibit s L, M, O and P to McCaffery Declaration)(Young, Kristi) |
| Filing 51 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #35 filed by Defendant United Technologies Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Thomas F. McCaffery, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Exhibit L, #14 Exhibit M, #15 Exhibit N)(Garratt, Justin) |
| Filing 50 SEALED DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION to file document Declarations and designated exhibits under seal #49 filed by Defendant The Boeing Company. (Attachments: #1 Unredacted Document Exhibit A to Decl of Young, #2 Unredacted Document Exhibti B to Decl of Young, #3 Unredacted Document Exhibit C to Decl of Young, #4 Unredacted Document Declaration of Leatherman ISO OPP to Remand, #5 Unredacted Document Exhibit 1 - Basic Agreement AF33(657)-5005 - ITAR, #6 Unredacted Document Exhibit 4 Segment 001 of - F-100A Detail Specification - ITAR, #7 Unredacted Document Exhibit 4 Segment 002 of - F-100A Detail Specification - ITAR, #8 Unredacted Document Exhibit 4 Segment 003 of - F-100A Detail Specification - ITAR, #9 Unredacted Document Exhibit 5 - R-1800-E (with Amendments) - ITAR, #10 Unredacted Document Declaration of Shimamoto ISO Opp to Remand, #11 Unredacted Document Exhibit 1 Segment 001 - N00019-C-69-0521 - ITAR, #12 Unredacted Document Exhibit 1 Segment 002 - N00019-C-69-0521 - ITAR, #13 Unredacted Document Exhibit 1 Segment 003- N00019-C-69-0521 - ITAR, #14 Unredacted Document Exhibit 1 Segment 004 - N00019-C-69-0521 - ITAR, #15 Unredacted Document Exhibit 1 Segment 005- N00019-C-69-0521 - ITAR, #16 Unredacted Document Exhibit 4 Segment 001 of - F-4E Det Spec E473-2 - ITAR, #17 Unredacted Document Exhibit 4 Segment 002 of - F-4E Det Spec E473-2 - ITAR, #18 Unredacted Document Exhibit 4 Segment 003 of - F-4E Det Spec E473-2 - ITAR, #19 Unredacted Document Exhibit 4 Segment 004 of - F-4E Det Spec E473-2 - ITAR, #20 Unredacted Document Exhibit 4 Segment 005 of - F-4E Det Spec E473-2 - ITAR, #21 Unredacted Document Exhibit 4 Segment 006 of - F-4E Det Spec E473-2 - ITAR, #22 Unredacted Document Exhibit 5 Segment 001 of - Contract 63-0032-i - ITAR, #23 Unredacted Document Exhibit 5 Segment 002 of - Contract 63-0032-i - ITAR, #24 Unredacted Document Exhibit 6 Segment 001 of - F-4B SD-513-1-6 - ITAR, #25 Unredacted Document Exhibit 6 Segment 002 of- F-4B SD-513-1-6 - ITAR, #26 Unredacted Document Exhibit 8 - ECP 695 - ITAR, #27 Unredacted Document Exhibit 9 - Change Order for ECP 695 - ITAR, #28 Unredacted Document Exhibit 10 - Memo for ECP 980 - ITAR, #29 Unredacted Document Exhibit 17 - Dwg 50109 - ITAR, #30 Unredacted Document Exhibit 18 - Dwg 501515 - ITAR, #31 Unredacted Document Exhibit 19 - Dwg 50164 - ITAR, #32 Unredacted Document Exhibit 20 - Dwg 50181 - ITAR, #33 Unredacted Document Exhibit 21 - Dwg 58310 - ITAR, #34 Unredacted Document Exhibit 22 - Dwg 52016 - ITAR, #35 Unredacted Document Exhibit 23 - Dwg 83599 - ITAR, #36 Unredacted Document Exhibit 25 - Dwg 831644 - ITAR, #37 Unredacted Document Exhibit 26 - Dwg 831658 - ITAR)(Young, Kristi) |
| Filing 49 APPLICATION to file document Declarations and designated exhibits under seal filed by Defendant The Boeing Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Redacted Document Declaration of Nolan Leatherman ISO Opp to Remand, #3 Exhibit 1 (Redacted), #4 Exhibit 2, Part 1 of 2, #5 Exhibit 2, Part 2 of 2, #6 Exhibit 3, Part 1 of 5, #7 Exhibit 3, Part 2 of 5, #8 Exhibit 3, Part 3 of 5, #9 Exhibit 3, Part 4 of 5, #10 Exhibit 3, Part 5 of 5, #11 Exhibit 4 (Redacted), #12 Exhibit 5 (Redacted), #13 Exhibit 6, #14 Exhibit 7, #15 Exhibit 8, #16 Exhibit 9, #17 Exhibit 10, #18 Exhibit 11, #19 Exhibit 12, #20 Exhibit 13, #21 Exhibit 14, #22 Exhibit 15, #23 Redacted Document Shimamoto Decl ISO Opp to Remand, #24 Exhibit 1, #25 Exhibit 2, #26 Exhibit 3, Part 1 of 5, #27 Exhibit 3, Part 2 of 5, #28 Exhibit 3, Part 3 of 5, #29 Exhibit 3, Part 4 of 5, #30 Exhibit 3, Part 5 of 5, #31 Exhibit 4 (Redacted), #32 Exhibit 5 (Redacted), #33 Exhibit 6 (Redacted), #34 Exhibit 7, #35 Exhibit 8 (Redacted), #36 Exhibit 9 (Redacted), #37 Exhibit 10 (Redacted), #38 Exhibit 11, #39 Exhibit 12, #40 Exhibit 13, #41 Exhibit 14, #42 Exhibit 15, #43 Exhibit 16, #44 Exhibit 17 (Redacted), #45 Exhibit 18 (Redacted), #46 Exhibit 19 (Redacted), #47 Exhibit 20 (Redacted), #48 Exhibit 21 (Redacted), #49 Exhibit 22 (Redacted), #50 Exhibit 23 (Redacted), #51 Exhibit 24, #52 Exhibit 25 (Redacted), #53 Exhibit 26 (Redacted), #54 Exhibit 27, #55 Exhibit 28)(Young, Kristi) |
| Filing 48 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Miscellaneous Document #47 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Appearance. Other error(s) with document(s): To find the correct efiling event Civil Events - Other Filings - Notices - Appearance. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lom) |
| Filing 47 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE/CIRRUS ENTER. filed by Defendant Cirrus Enterprises LLC (Hartley, Edward) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF ORIGINAL FILED ANSWER to Complaint filed by defendant Shell Oil company (FILED IN STATE COURT (Dated 1/14/2019) SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A TO NOTICE #44 .) (iv) |
| Filing 46 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Ross M Petty counsel for Defendant Shell Oil Company. Adding Ross M. Petty as counsel of record for Shell Oil Company for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Shell Oil Company. (Attorney Ross M Petty added to party Shell Oil Company(pty:dft))(Petty, Ross) |
| Filing 45 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Shell Oil Company, identifying Shell Petroleum Inc.. (Brian, Aaron) |
| Filing 44 NOTICE of Filing State Court Answer to Plaintiffs' Complaint filed by Defendant Shell Oil Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Answer)(Brian, Aaron) |
| Filing 43 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Aaron M Brian counsel for Defendant Shell Oil Company. Adding Aaron M. Brian as counsel of record for Shell Oil Company for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Shell Oil Company. (Attorney Aaron M Brian added to party Shell Oil Company(pty:dft))(Brian, Aaron) |
| Filing 42 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Motion to Remand #35 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed order not submitted pursuant to Local Rule 52-4.1. A Word or Wordperfect version of the proposed order should also be emailed to the chambers generic email address. See Local Rule 5-4.4.1- Electronic Lodging of Proposed Orders.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (iv) |
|
Filing 41
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC. AND WYETH HOLDINGS CORPORATION #38 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. The Court approves the stipulation and orders that all claims against defendants CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC. and WYETH HOLDINGS CORPORATION are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(2). Pursuant to stipulation, the parties shall bear their own costs. (iv)
|
| Filing 40 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. On the Court's own motion, the Scheduling Conference is continued to April 1, 2019 at 10:00 AM before Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rs) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 39 Amendment to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #35 filed by Plaintiffs Barbara Meza, Harold Meza. (Foley, Crystal) |
| Filing 38 STIPULATION to Dismiss Defendants Cytec Industries Inc., Wyeth Holdings Corporation filed by Plaintiff Harold Meza, Barbara Meza. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Foley, Crystal) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF ORIGINAL FILED ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendant Wyeth Holdings LLC. (FILED IN STATE COURT 1/16/2019) SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A TO NOTICE #37 .) (Attorney Peter A Strotz added to party Wyeth Holdings LLC(pty:dft))(iv) |
| Filing 37 NOTICE of Re-Filing State Court Answer to Plaintiffs' Complaint filed by defendant Wyeth Holdings LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Answer Filed in State Court)(Lawless, John) |
| Filing 36 NOTICE of Errata to Defendant Wyeth Holdings LLC's Answer to Plaintiffs' Complaint filed by defendant Wyeth Holdings Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Lawless, John) |
| Filing 35 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Barbara Meza, Harold Meza. Motion set for hearing on 3/18/2019 at 10:00 AM before Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. (Attachments: #1 Declaration OF PAUL C. COOK, #2 Exhibit A-B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E-G) (Foley, Crystal) |
| Filing 34 NOTICE OF DOE AMENDMENT filed by Plaintiff Barbara Meza, Harold Meza. (Foley, Crystal) |
| Filing 32 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery),, 3M Company's Answer to Plaintiffs' Complaint for Personal Injury - Asbestos filed by Defendant 3M Company.(Attorney Stephanie Ghanem Peatman added to party 3M Company(pty:dft))(Peatman, Stephanie) |
|
Filing 33
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This case has been assigned to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. This matter is set for a scheduling conference on 3/18/2019 at 11:00 AM. (iv)
|
|
Filing 31
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT JOHN CRANE, INC. #30 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. The Court, having considered the stipulation between plaintiffs Harold Meza and Barbara Meza and defendant John Crane Inc., hereby approves the stipulation and orders that all claims against defendant JOHN CRANE INC., are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(2). Pursuant to stipulation, the parties shall bear their own costs.John Crane Inc. terminated. (smo)
|
| Filing 30 STIPULATION to Dismiss Defendant John Crane Inc. filed by Plaintiff Harold Meza, Barbara Meza. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Foley, Crystal) |
| Filing 29 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by defendant Arkema, Inc., (Deane, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 28 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery),, with JURY DEMAND NOTICE OF REFILING STATE COURT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT AND REQUEST FOR JURY TRIAL filed by defendant Arkema, Inc..(Goldberg, Karen) |
| Filing 27 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Jeffrey W Deane counsel for Defendant Arkema, Inc.. Adding Jeffrey W. Deane as counsel of record for Arkema Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by defendant Arkema Inc.. (Attorney Jeffrey W Deane added to party Arkema, Inc.(pty:dft))(Deane, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 26 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Karen B Goldberg counsel for Defendant Arkema, Inc.. Adding Karen B. Goldberg as counsel of record for Arkema Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by defendant Arkema Inc.. (Attorney Karen B Goldberg added to party Arkema, Inc.(pty:dft))(Goldberg, Karen) |
| Filing 24 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant BASF Corporation identifying BASF Corporation is a wholly owned subsidiary of BASF Americas Corporation. BASF Americas Corporation is a wholly owned subsidiary of BASFIN Corporation. BASFIN Corporation is a majority owned subsidiary of BASF USA Holding LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. BASF USA Holding LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary of BASF Nederland BV, a Dutch limited liability company, which in turn is a wholly owned subsidiary of BASF SE (Societas Europea SE), a publicly traded European Company. BASF Corporation, BASF Americas Corporation, BASFIN Corporation, BASF USA Holding LLC and BASF Nederland BV are not publicly held. as Corporate Parent. (Mandell, Michael) |
| Filing 23 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery),, with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant BASF Corporation.(Attorney Michael Laurence Mandell added to party BASF Corporation(pty:dft))(Mandell, Michael) |
|
Filing 25
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT BASF CATALYSTS LLC #21 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. All claims against defendant BASF CATALYSTS LLC, are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(2). Pursuant to stipulation, the parties shall bear their own costs. (iv)
|
| Filing 22 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff All Plaintiffs, (Foley, Crystal) |
| Filing 21 STIPULATION to Dismiss Defendant BASF Catalysts LLC filed by Plaintiff Harold Meza, Barbara Meza. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Foley, Crystal) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 1/16/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A TO NOTICE #20 )(iv) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE OF FILING STATE COURT ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL filed by Defendant The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company. (Uchida, David) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, identifying The Vanguard Group. (Uchida, David) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Wyeth Holdings Corporation. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 1/16/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (iv) |
| Filing 18 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Wyeth Holdings Corporation answer now due 2/22/2019, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Wyeth Holdings Corporation.(Attorney Vincent Frank Tremonti, II added to party Wyeth Holdings Corporation(pty:dft))(Tremonti, Vincent) |
| Filing 17 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Wyeth Holdings Corporation, identifying Pfizer Inc., Cytec Industries Inc.. (Attorney John R Lawless, Jr added to party Wyeth Holdings Corporation(pty:dft))(Lawless, John) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Re-Filing State Court Answer to Plaintiffs' Complaint filed by Defendant Wyeth Holdings Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Answer to Complaint)(Lawless, John) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Rohr Inc. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 1/15/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A)(iv) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE Refiling State Court Answer to Complaint filed by Defendant Rohr Inc.. (Glaspy, David) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Rohr Inc., identifying United Technologies Corporation. (Glaspy, David) |
| Filing 13 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney David M Glaspy counsel for Defendant Rohr Inc.. Adding David M. Glaspy as counsel of record for Rohr, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Rohr, Inc.. (Attorney David M Glaspy added to party Rohr Inc.(pty:dft))(Glaspy, David) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice (Other), #7 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is Joinder in Complaint. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ghap) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice (Other), #4 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is Joinder in Complaint. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so.. (ghap) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments 5 Civil Cover Sheet is attached to the Notice of Removal. Each of these documents should have been filed and entered separately under its correct event/relief. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ghap) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF JOINDER filed by Defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. DEFENDANT THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANYS NOTICE OF JOINDER IN UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATIONS REMOVAL OF ACTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1442(a)(1) AND 1446 (FEDERAL OFFICER) AND NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY; DECLARATION OF DAVID M. UCHIDA; CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (Uchida, David) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants 3M Company, Arkema, Inc., BASF Catalysts LLC, BASF Corporation, CBS Corporation, Certain-Teed Corporation, Cirrus Enterprises LLC, Crown Cork and Seal Company, Inc., Cytec Industries Inc., Does 1-850, inclusive, Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, General Electric Company, Henkel Corporation, Industrial Holdings Corporation, Ingersoll-Rand Company, John Crane Inc., Kelly Moore Paint Company Inc., Rohr Inc., Shell Oil Company, Soco West, Inc., The Boeing Company, The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, Union Carbide Corporation. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiffs Harold Meza, Barbara Meza. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 12/10/2018 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant United Technologies Corporation. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 1/11/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT B)(ghap) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant The Boeing Company, (Young, Kristi) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 JURY DEMAND. Defendant The Boeing Company's Answer to Plaintiffs' Complaint; Demand for Jury Trial filed by Defendant The Boeing Company.(Attorney Kristi Leigh Kasey Young added to party The Boeing Company(pty:dft))(Young, Kristi) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE Defendant The Boeing Company's Notice of Joinder in Defendant United Technologies Corporation's Removal of Action Under 28 U.S.C. section 1442(a) filed by Defendant The Boeing Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A-Plaintiffs' Complaint for Personal Injury, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B-Plaintiffs' Preliminary Facts Sheet, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C-Documents Required by 28 U.S.C. 1446(a))(Young, Kristi) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant United Technologies Corporation, re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on 1/16/19. (Garratt, Justin) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant United Technologies Corporation, identifying Global Aerospace. (Garratt, Justin) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County, case number 18STCV07768 Receipt No: 0973-23051160 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant United Technologies Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Justin E Garratt added to party United Technologies Corporation(pty:dft))(Garratt, Justin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
