Irmalydia O. Quiambao v. Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Irmalydia O. Quiambao
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number: 2:2019cv00353
Filed: January 16, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Frederick F Mumm
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 21, 2019 Filing 11 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm for all further proceedings. Please use the case number CV19-353 on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn)
February 20, 2019 Filing 10 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill. (Attorney Lara A Bradt added to party Nancy A. Berryhill(pty:dft))(Bradt, Lara)
February 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm: (see attached) (jm)
February 7, 2019 Filing 8 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), (Rosales, Steven)
February 7, 2019 Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Irmalydia O. Quiambao, upon Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill served on 2/1/2019, answer due 6/3/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Rosales, Steven)
January 18, 2019 Filing 6 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill. (ghap)
January 18, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and referred to Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (ghap)
January 16, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Irmalydia O Quiambao, (Rosales, Steven)
January 16, 2019 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Irmalydia O Quiambao. (Rosales, Steven)
January 16, 2019 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Irmalydia O Quiambao. (Rosales, Steven)
January 16, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23055987 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Irmalydia O Quiambao. (Attorney Steven G Rosales added to party Irmalydia O Quiambao(pty:pla))(Rosales, Steven)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Irmalydia O. Quiambao v. Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Irmalydia O. Quiambao
Represented By: Steven G Rosales
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By: Lara A Bradt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?