Henry E. Diaz II v. Stu Sherman
| Henry E. Diaz II |
| Stu Sherman |
| 2:2019cv00591 |
| January 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andrew J Guilford |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: REQUEST FOR STAY by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. The Court therefore defers consideration of Petitioners premature andinadequately supported request for a stay. In the interests of justice, the Court will give Petitioner until March 29 to submit the items described above. Alternatively, if Petitioner does not believe that he can demonstrate his entitlement to a Rhines stay, he may withdraw the request without consequence.(See Minute Order for further details) deferring ruling on #5 REQUEST to Stay Case ; deferring ruling on #5 REQUEST for Abeyance (vm)
|
| Filing 5 REQUEST to Stay and Abeyance case filed by petitioner Henry E. Diaz II. (vm) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE of California Attorney General Office Nicholas J. Webster on behalf of Respondent Stu Sherman. (Attorney Nicholas James Webster added to party Stu Sherman(pty:res))(Webster, Nicholas) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER RE: SCREENING OF HABEAS PETITION by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. Petitioner is directed to submit a supplemental statement to the Court by or before February 28, 2019. (See Minute Order for further details) Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 Part 2) (vm)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Andrew J. Guilford and referred to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV111) (jtil) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254), filed by Petitioner Henry E. Diaz II. Case assigned to Judge Andrew J. Guilford and referred to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (Filing fee $ 5.) (Attachments: #1 Part 2) (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Henry E. Diaz II v. Stu Sherman | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Henry E. Diaz II | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Stu Sherman | |
| Represented By: | Nicholas James Webster |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
