California Fair Plan v. Rheem Manufacturing Company et al
| California Fair Plan Association and California Fair Plan |
| Does 1-50, inclusive, Rheem Manufacturing Company, Home Depot USA, Inc., Does 1-10, inclusive and The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. |
| 2:2019cv00615 |
| January 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Suzanne H Segal |
| John F Walter |
| Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 Receipt of Copy of Remand Transmittal Letter from Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. 18STCV01885, acknowledged on 2/21/2019. (iv) |
| Filing 17 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Clerk, Los Angeles Superior Court. (iv) |
Filing 16
ORDER RE REMAND OF REMOVED ACTION by Judge John F. Walter. The Parties' Stipulation is approved; The Central District of California Case number 2:19-cv-00615, titled CALIFORNIA FAIR PLAN v. RHEEM MANUFACTURING COMPANY, et al., is hereby remanded to the Los Angeles Superior Court. Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (iv)
|
| Filing 15 STIPULATION to Remand Case to State Court filed by Defendant Rheem Manufacturing Company, The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Schirm, Barry) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER ON REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF SUBSTITUTION OR WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY #13 by Judge John F. Walter. The request of Home Depot U.S.A. to substitute Barry Schirm as attorney of record instead of Elizabeth Rein, Robert Dixon and Vickie Turner is GRANTED. (iv)
|
| Filing 13 REQUEST TO SUBSTITUTE ATTORNEY Barry R. Schirm in place of attorney Elizabeth C. Rein filed by Defendant The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Attorney Barry R Schirm added to party The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.(pty:dft)) (Schirm, Barry) |
| Filing 12 DECLARATION of Barry R. Schirm re Compliance with Local Rules Governing Electronic Filing filed by Defendant Rheem Manufacturing Company. (Schirm, Barry) |
| Filing 11 DECLARATION of Robert K. Dixon Re: Lead Trial Counsel and Compliance of Local Rules Governing Electronic Filings filed by Defendant The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.. (Dixon, Robert) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS): COURT ORDERS by Judge John F. Walter: Counsel are hereby notified that a Scheduling Conference has been set for 2/25/2019 at 01:15 PM before Judge John F. Walter in Courtroom 7A, 350 W. 1st St, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Lead Trial Counsel shall attend all proceedings before this Court, including the Scheduling Conference. Counsel are directed to comply with Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 26-1 in a timely fashion and to file a Joint Report, on or before 2/19/2019. (jp)
|
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) Modified on 1/29/2019 (car). |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. (car) |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Rheem Manufacturing Company. Submitted with Attachment 3 to Notice of Removal #1 (Attorney Barry R Schirm added to party Rheem Manufacturing Company(pty:dft))(car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-50, inclusive, The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., Rheem Manufacturing Company, filed by plaintiff California Fair Plan. Filed in State Court on 10/19/18 Submitted with attachment 2 to notice of removal #1 (car) Modified on 1/29/2019 (car). |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. Submitted with Attachment 5 to Notice of Removal #1 .(Attorney Vickie E Turner added to party Home Depot USA, Inc.(pty:dft))(car) Modified on 1/29/2019 (car). |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Home Depot USA, Inc., re Jury Demand #4 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),,, #1 served on January 25, 2019. (Dixon, Robert) |
| Filing 4 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendant Home Depot USA, Inc... (Dixon, Robert) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Home Depot USA, Inc., identifying Home Depot, Inc.. (Dixon, Robert) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Home Depot USA, Inc.. (Dixon, Robert) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number 18STCV01885 Receipt No: 0973-23104123 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Home Depot USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Robert K. Dixon in Support of Notice of Removal of Action, #2 Exhibit A to Declarationof Robert K. Dixon in Support of Notice of Removal of Action, #3 Exhibit B to Declaration of Robert K. Dixon in Support of Notice of Removal of Action, #4 Exhibit C to Declaration of Robert K. Dixon in Support of Notice of Removal of Action, #5 Exhibit D to Declaration of Robert K. Dixon in Support of Notice of Removal of Action, #6 Exhibit E to Declaration of Robert K. Dixon in Support of Notice of Removal of Action, #7 Exhibit F to Declaration of Robert K. Dixon in Support of Notice of Removal of Action) (Attorney Robert Kenneth Dixon added to party Home Depot USA, Inc.(pty:dft))(Dixon, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
