Thomas E. Andrews et al v. Mitch R. Wade et al
| Thomas E. Andrews and Ruthellen Sheflin |
| Roes, Does 1-10 inclusive, Mitch R. Wade, Peach Canyon Farm LLC and Freston Wade FamilyLLC |
| 2:2019cv00967 |
| February 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver, ORDERING Letter submitted by Plaintiff Thomas E. Andrews received on 2/27/2019 is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: Case transferred to the District of Utah and closed. Please direct inquiries to District of Utah, Case No. 1:19-cv-00015. (dml)
|
| Filing 7 TEXT-ONLY ENTRY - RECEIVED Notice of Receipt of Electronic Case Transfer from District of Utah, 1:19-cv-00015 filed 3/1/2019. (iv) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall transfer this matter from this Court to the United States District Court for the District of Utah. Case transferred electronically. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (iv)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (esa) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Thomas E. Andrews. (esa) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against defendants Does 1-10, Freston Wade FamilyLLC, Peach Canyon Farm LLC, Roes 11-21, inclusive, Mitch R. Wade.Case assigned to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver, filed by plaintiffs Thomas E. Andrews, Ruthellen Sheflin. (esa) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE RE: DISCREPANCIES WITH LODGING OF COMPLAINT mailed to plaintiffs Thomas E. Andrews, Ruthellen Sheflin. Upon submission of your complaint it was noted that you did not pay the appropriate filing fee. If you are unable to pay the entire filing fee at this time, you must sign and complete the Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support form (CV-60P) attached. If you do not respond within THIRTY DAYS from the date below, your action will be dismissed and the file closed. If you submit the CV-60P form or pay the filing fee within THIRTY DAYS, your case will be filed. You may return your fee waiver and/or payment to any of the Courthouses listed on this notice. Re Lodged Complaint (esa) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/8/2019: #1 lodged complaint) (esa). |
| LODGED COMPLAINT: Complaint sought to be filed by Plaintiffs Thomas E. Andrews, Ruthellen Sheflin. (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
