Aaron Samsky v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
| Aaron Samsky |
| State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Does 1 through 100, inclusive |
| 2:2019cv00992 |
| February 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Christina A Snyder |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 NOTICE TO COUNSEL upon filing of the complaint by Judge Christina A. Snyder. (rba) |
| Filing 17 SCHEDULING NOTICE DENIED AS MOOT by Judge Christina A. Snyder re: Notice (Other) #14 , pursuant to the Courts MINUTE ORDER #15 . THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cj) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 16 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice (Other) #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Order. Other error(s) with document(s): Please use the search feature and search for a word or phrase. This event can be found, see: Motions and Related Filings - Applications/Ex Parte Applications/Motions/Petitions/Requests. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lom) |
| Filing 15 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND (Dkt. #9 , filed on March 10, 2019) by Judge Christina A. Snyder. For the foregoing reasons, the Court DENIES plaintiff's motion to remand. The Court also DENIES plaintiff's request for attorney's fees related to the preparation and filing of his motion for remand. IT IS SO ORDERED. (lom) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE Request to Appear by Telephone; Proposed Order filed by Plaintiff Aaron Samsky. (Carlin, Nicholas) |
| Filing 13 REPLY in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #9 filed by Plaintiff Aaron Samsky. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Counsel in Support of Plaintiff's Reply to Motion to Remand)(Carlin, Nicholas) |
| Filing 12 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE Request for Judicial Notice In Support of Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand filed by Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Brugge, Robert) |
| Filing 11 DECLARATION of Robert D. Brugge in opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #9 Declaration of Robert D. Brugge In Support of State Farm's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand filed by Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Brugge, Robert) |
| Filing 10 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #9 Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company's Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand filed by Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Brugge, Robert) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Aaron Samsky. Motion set for hearing on 4/8/2019 at 10:00 AM before Judge Christina A. Snyder. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion to Remand, #2 Declaration Declaration of Counsel in Support of Motion to Remand, #3 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Granting Motion to Remand) (Carlin, Nicholas) |
| Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Re Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program served on February 21, 2019. (Brugge, Robert) |
| Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Re Notice of Assignment to United States Judges served on February 21, 2019. (Brugge, Robert) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Does 1 through 100. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Aaron Samsky. #1 [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 12/28/2018 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL] (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, filed by Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. #1 [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 2/7/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL](lh) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #3 Certificate of Service of Notice to Adverse Party of Removal to Federal Court served on 02/08/19. (Brugge, Robert) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 18STCV10274 with filing fee previously paid ($400 paid on 02/08/19, receipt number 0973-23185989), filed by Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.(Brugge, Robert) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Certificate of Interested Persons or Entities NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, (Attorney Robert Douglas Brugge added to party State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company(pty:dft))(Brugge, Robert) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Brugge, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
