Kyle Sturzenbecher v. Photo-Sonics, Inc
| Kyle Sturzenbecher |
| Photo-Sonics, Inc |
| 2:2019cv01053 |
| February 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alexander F MacKinnon |
| Christina A Snyder |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| 09 U.S.C. ยง 0001 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION OF DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS LABOR COMMISSIONER'S OFFICE STATE CASE Kyle Sturzenbecher. (Attachments: #1 Part 2) (lom) |
| Filing 6 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Photo-Sonics, Inc, re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, Set/Reset Motion Hearing and R&R Deadlines, #5 , Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #3 , Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #2 served on March 11, 2019. (Allen, Treana) |
Filing 5
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court is in receipt of Defendants Petition to Compel Arbitration #1 , The Court hereby sets the following briefing schedule: The plaintiff shall file an opposition no later than April 5, 2019; and Petitioner shall file an optional reply brief or opposition to any motion to dismiss no later than April 19, 2019; and Hearing on defendants Petition to Compel Arbitration is set on May 6, 2019, at10:00 A.M. (lc)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments 8 Civil Cover Sheet is attached to the Petition. Each of these documents should have been filed and entered separately under its correct event/relief. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (ghap) |
| Filing 1 PETITION Receipt No: 0973-23199319 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Photo-Sonics, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Elena Becerra, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Declaration Kathryn Treesuwan, #7 Proposed Order, #8 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney John A Haubrich added to party Photo-Sonics, Inc(pty:dft))(Haubrich, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kyle Sturzenbecher v. Photo-Sonics, Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Photo-Sonics, Inc | |
| Represented By: | John A Haubrich |
| Represented By: | Treana Louise Allen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kyle Sturzenbecher | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
