Peter R. Tia v. Public Defender of the Federal Office et al
Plaintiff: Peter R. Tia
Defendant: Public Defender of the Federal Office and Georgina E. Wakefield
Case Number: 2:2019cv01144
Filed: February 14, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Alka Sagar
Referring Judge: Otis D Wright
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 22, 2019 Filing 8 Mail Returned addressed to Peter R. Tia re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held #7 . (hr)
March 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO PROVIDE COURT WITH HIS CURRENT ADDRESS PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 41-6 by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. Plaintiff is ORDERED to notify this Court of his current address and telephone number within ten days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff is expressly cautioned that if he fails to respond to this Order, the Court will recommend that this action be dismissed with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), for Petitioner's failure to prosecute. (see document for further details) (hr)
March 7, 2019 Filing 6 Mail Returned addressed to Peter R. Tia re Order on Request re Filing Complaint Without Prepayment of Filing Fees or Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (CV-93), #4 . Not in Custody. (hr)
March 6, 2019 Filing 5 Mail Returned addressed to Peter R. Tia re Notice of Reference to US Magistrate Judge (CV-25) #3 . Not in custody. (hr)
February 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILINGS FEES #2 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees is: DENIED, and this case is hereby DISMISSED IMMEDIATELY. MD JS-6, Case Terminated. (lom)
February 14, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and referred to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (ghap)
February 14, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING OF COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES OR REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (CV-93). (ghap)
February 14, 2019 Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Public Defender of the Federal Office, Georgina E. Wakefield(official capacity), Georgina E. Wakefield(individual) pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge Otis D. Wright, II and referred to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar., filed by plaintiff Peter R. Tia. (ghap)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Peter R. Tia v. Public Defender of the Federal Office et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Public Defender of the Federal Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Georgina E. Wakefield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Peter R. Tia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?