Steve Siebold v. Wendy Keller et al
Steve Siebold |
Keller Media Inc and Wendy Keller |
2:2019cv01173 |
February 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jean P Rosenbluth |
George H Wu |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. § 101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to All Parties, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Steve Siebold.(Hodge, Christopher) |
Filing 25 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Steve Siebold, upon Defendant Wendy Keller served on 3/6/2019, answer due 3/27/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Marlene Mercado - UPS Store Clerk, designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of Defendant in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service by mail and no service by mail was executed.Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Diligence, #2 Affidavit of Diligence)(Malmberg, Mieke) |
Filing 24 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Steve Siebold, upon Defendant Keller Media Inc served on 3/6/2019, answer due 3/27/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Marlene Mercado - UPS Store Clerk, designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of Defendant in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service by mail and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit of Diligence, #2 Affidavit Affidavit of Diligence)(Malmberg, Mieke) |
|
|
|
Filing 20 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Paul J. Skiermont to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Steve Siebold (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-23268808) filed by Plaintiff Steve Siebold. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order proposed Order) (Malmberg, Mieke) |
Filing 19 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Christopher M. Hodge to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Steve Siebold (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-23247215) #16 by Clerk of Court. Docket No. 16 is stricken for the reason stated in the Notice #17 filed on February 22, 2019. (mrgo) |
Filing 18 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Christopher M. Hodge to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Steve Siebold (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400.00 Previously Paid on 2/21/2019, Receipt No. 0973-23247215) filed by Plaintiff Steve Siebold. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order proposed Order) (Malmberg, Mieke) |
Filing 17 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Christopher M. Hodge to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Steve Siebold (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-23247215) #16 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 5-4.3.4 Application not hand-signed. (lt) |
Filing 16 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER DOC. NO. 19] APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Christopher M. Hodge to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Steve Siebold (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-23247215) filed by Plaintiff Steve Siebold. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order proposed Order) (Malmberg, Mieke) Modified on 2/25/2019 (mrgo). |
Filing 15 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Pro Hac Vice Application Due (G-109) - optional html form 12 . Document number 12 due to clerical error. The docket clerk failed to attach the entire image of the new action. (ghap) |
Filing 14 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Christopher Hodge. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (ghap) |
Filing 13 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Paul J Skiermont. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (ghap) |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Paul J Skiermont. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (ghap) |
Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Keller Media Inc. (ghap) |
Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Wendy Keller. (ghap) |
Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (ghap) |
Filing 7 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Steve Siebold. (Malmberg, Mieke) |
Filing 6 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Steve Siebold. (Malmberg, Mieke) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Steve Siebold, (Malmberg, Mieke) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Steve Siebold. (Malmberg, Mieke) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Steve Siebold. (Malmberg, Mieke) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid (400.00 paid on 02152019, receipt number 26FENBSQ), filed by Plaintiff Steve Siebold.(Malmberg, Mieke) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23222604 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Steve Siebold. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex A, #2 Exhibit Ex B, #3 Exhibit Ex C, #4 Exhibit Ex D, #5 Exhibit Ex E, #6 Exhibit Ex F, #7 Exhibit Ex G, #8 Exhibit Ex H, #9 Exhibit Ex I, #10 Exhibit Ex J) (Attorney Mieke K Malmberg added to party Steve Siebold(pty:pla))(Malmberg, Mieke) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.