Swift Harvest USA, LLC v. Family Dollar, Inc. et al
| Swift Harvest USA, LLC |
| Does 1-10 and Family Dollar, Inc. |
| Family Dollar, Inc., a North Carolina Corporation |
| 2:2019cv01195 |
| February 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Ronald SW Lew |
| Alicia G Rosenberg |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. § 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE GRANTING by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: GRANTING #15 #18 Non-Resident Attorney Lauren B. Rainwater APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Family Dollar Inc, designating James H. Moon as local counsel. (lt)
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: GRANTING #14 #16 Non-Resident Attorney Warren J. Rheaume APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Family Dollar Inc, designating James H. Moon as local counsel. (lt)
|
| Filing 18 Second APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Lauren B. Rainwater to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Family Dollar, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400.00 Previously Paid on 3/28/2019, Receipt No. 0973-23427471) filed by defendant Family Dollar, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Moon, James) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Lauren B. Rainwater to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Family Dollar, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-23427471) #15 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(d) Certificate of Good Standing not attached for every state court listed to which the applicant has been admitted. NY missing. (lt) |
| Filing 16 Corrected APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Warren J. Rheaume to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Family Dollar, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400.00 Previously Paid on 3/22/2019, Receipt No. 26G9NSQ6) filed by defendant Family Dollar, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Moon, James) |
| Filing 15 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Lauren B. Rainwater to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Family Dollar, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-23427471) filed by defendant Family Dollar, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Moon, James) |
| Filing 14 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Warren J. Rheaume to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Family Dollar, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-23427227) filed by defendant Family Dollar, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Moon, James) |
|
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: The above matter is set for a Scheduling Conference on May 14, 2019, at 10:00 A.M. The conference will be held pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 16(b). The parties are reminded of their obligations to disclose information and confer on a discovery plan not later than 21 days prior to the scheduling conference and report to the Court not later than 14 days after they confer as required by F.R.Civ.P. 26 and the Local Rules of this Court. Failure to comply may lead to the imposition of sanctions. See order for further details. (jre)
|
| Filing 12 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Family Dollar, Inc. identifying Dollar Tree, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Moon, James) |
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Family Dollar, Inc., identifying Family Dollar Stores, Inc.; Dollar Tree, Inc.; Huajun Toys Co. Ltd.; Swift Harvest USA, LLC. (Moon, James) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Family Dollar, Inc..(Attorney James H Moon added to party Family Dollar, Inc.(pty:dft))(Moon, James) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Swift Harvest USA, LLC, upon Defendant Family Dollar, Inc. served on 2/22/2019, answer due 3/15/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CSC Lawyers Registered Agent, Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Raucher, Stephen) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Family Dollar, Inc. (et) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S. W. Lew and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (et) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Swift Harvest USA, LLC. (Raucher, Stephen) |
| Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Swift Harvest USA, LLC. (Raucher, Stephen) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Swift Harvest USA, LLC, identifying Aquawood LLC; Banzai International Limited; Focus Brand Limited. (Raucher, Stephen) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant Swift Harvest USA, LLC. (Raucher, Stephen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23226948 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Swift Harvest USA, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - D) (Attorney Stephen L Raucher added to party Swift Harvest USA, LLC(pty:bkmov))(Raucher, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
