Jane Doe v. Los Angeles Police Officer Munoz et al
| Jane Doe |
| Police Officer Munoz and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2019cv01227 |
| February 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Consuelo B Marshall |
| John E McDermott |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. Scheduling Conference set for 7/30/2019 at 10:00 AM before Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. (ys)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Miscellaneous Document #13 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Civil Events - Service Documents - Service/ Waivers of Summons and Complaint - select - Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed 21 days. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (shb) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe (Sedaghatfar, Anahita) |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Munoz, (Shepherd, Surekha) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Munoz.(Attorney Surekha A Shepherd added to party Munoz(pty:dft))(Shepherd, Surekha) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jane Doe, upon Defendant Munoz served on 3/7/2019, answer due 3/28/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Officer Mark, Subpoena Control, Person in Charge in compliance with statute not specified by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Sedaghatfar, Anahita) |
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. It controls this case and may differ in some respects from the Local Rules. (ys)
|
| Filing 8 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Anahita Sedaghatfar counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe. Adding PLAITNIFF as counsel of record for JANE DOE for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by PLAINTIFF JANE DOE. (Sedaghatfar, Anahita) |
| Filing 7 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Megan R Gyongyos counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe. Adding Megan R. Gyongyos as counsel of record for Plaintiff Jane Doe for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe. (Gyongyos, Megan) |
| Filing 6 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendants Does, Munoz. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (esa) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe, identifying Jane Doe, Brian T. Dunn, Anahita Sedaghatfar, Megan R. Gyongyos, and Los Angeles Police Officer Munoz. (Dunn, Brian) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe. (Dunn, Brian) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe. (Dunn, Brian) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23235756 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe. (Attorney Brian T Dunn added to party Jane Doe(pty:pla))(Dunn, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
