Juan Jose Sandoval Perez et al v. Subaru of America Inc. et al
| Juan Jose Perez, Jose Herrera Perez, Juan Jose Sandoval Perez and Juan Jose S. Perez |
| Subaru of America Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2019cv01305 |
| February 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Patrick J Walsh |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Receipt of Acknowledgment of remand documents by Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles, case no. 18STCV10279. (lom) |
| Filing 11 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles County Superior Court. (mrgo) |
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson remanding case to Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case number 18STCV10279. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (mrgo)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. (car) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice (Other) #5 , Notice (Other) #4 . Other error(s) with document(s): Incorrect event of Notice Other was selected in the e-filing of these documents. The correct event category for the Civil Cover Sheet is located under Civil Events Other Filings Miscellaneous Filings - Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71). The correct event category for Jury Demand is located under Civil Events Other Filings Pretrial and Trial Documents - Jury Demand. No further action is required for the Civil Cover Sheet and for the Jury Demand unless the Court so directs. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: It appears that the State Court Complaint is attached to Attachment 2 Exhibit D and Attachment 5 Exhibit A. Unfortunately, the complaint is incomplete. The face page is missing. Please e-file a notice of errata and attach the complete version of the state court complaint. (car) |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Subaru of America Inc. Submitted with Attachment 6 Exhibit B to Notice of Removal #1 .(car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEMAND FOR JURY filed by Defendant Subaru of America Inc.. (Ruggerello, Ryan) |
| Filing 4 [CIVIL COVER SHEET filed as] NOTICE filed by Defendant Subaru of America Inc.. Civil Case Cover Sheet (Ruggerello, Ryan) Modified on 2/22/2019 (car). |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Subaru of America Inc., (Ruggerello, Ryan) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Subaru of America Inc., re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on 1. (Ruggerello, Ryan) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 18STCV10279] Receipt No: 0973-23251461 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Subaru of America Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Appendix of State Court Pleadings and Papers in Support of Removal of Action, #2 Exhibit D, #3 Exhibit E, #4 Declaration of Kristan L. Ruggerello, #5 Exhibit A, #6 Exhibit B, #7 Exhibit C) (Attorney Ryan P Ruggerello added to party Subaru of America Inc.(pty:dft))(Ruggerello, Ryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
