Matthew Villanueva v. American Honda Motor Company, Inc. et al
| Matthew Villanueva |
| Honda Motor Co., Ltd. and American Honda Motor Company, Inc. |
| 2:2019cv01390 |
| February 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION CONCERNING AMENDED COMPLAINT #11 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. The amended complaint shall be filed on April 29, or within three days of the Court's approval of this stipulation, whichever is later. Honda's motion to dismiss will be filed on or before June 19, 2019, Plaintiffs' opposition will be filed on or before July 19, 2019, and Honda's reply will be filed on or before August 16, 2019. (iv)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION for Order Concerning Amended Complaint and Briefing Timeline filed by plaintiff Matthew Villanueva. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Stein, David) |
|
Filing 13
AMENDED ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION CONCERNING AMENDED COMPLAINT #11 #12 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The amended complaint shall be filed on April 29, or within three days of the Court's approval of this stipulation, whichever is later. 2. Honda's motion to dismiss will be filed on or before June 4, 2019, Plaintiffs' opposition will be filed on or before July 9, 2019, and Honda's reply will be filed on or before July 23, 2019. 3. The amended complaint may include additional claims brought by other proposed class representatives relating to the subject matter of Plaintiff's lawsuit, which Honda may move to dismiss. (lom)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION CONCERNING BRIEFING AND CLASS CERTIFICATION SCHEDULE #9 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Plaintiff's amended complaint, if any, shall be due no later than April 29, 2019. (iv)
|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION for Order Concerning Briefing and Class Certification Schedule filed by Plaintiff Matthew Villanueva. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Lopez, Steven) |
| Filing 8 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to American Honda Motor Company, Inc. answer now due 4/25/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant American Honda Motor Company, Inc..(Attorney Amir M Nassihi added to party American Honda Motor Company, Inc.(pty:dft))(Nassihi, Amir) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant American Honda Motor Company, Inc. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Matthew Villanueva, identifying American Honda Company, Inc.; Honda Motor Co., Ltd.. (Stein, David) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Matthew Villanueva. (Stein, David) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Matthew Villanueva. (Stein, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23270017 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Matthew Villanueva. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Stein) (Attorney David K Stein added to party Matthew Villanueva(pty:pla))(Stein, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
