Thomas E. Andrews et al v. Scott Christensen et al
| Thomas E. Andrews and Ruthellen Sheflin |
| Roes, Does 1 to 10, Scott Christensen and Sidney Christensen |
| 2:2019cv01453 |
| February 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER OF DISMISSAL OR REMAND by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. The Court sent a warning letter to Plaintiff(s) advising that failure to correct this deficiency within THIRTY DAYS from the date of the warning letter would result in dismissal or remand of this case. More than THIRTY DAYS have now passed, and the deficiency has not been corrected. Accordingly, this case is HEREBY ORDERED DISMISSED. No further filings shall be accepted under this case number. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lom)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE RE: DISCREPANCIES WITH LODGING OF COMPLAINT mailed to Plaintiff Thomas E. Andrews. Upon submission of your complaint it was noted that you did not pay the appropriate filing fee. If you are unable to pay the entire filing fee at this time, you must sign and complete the Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support form (CV-60P) attached. If you do not respond within THIRTY DAYS from the date below, your action will be dismissed and the file closed. If you submit the CV-60P form or pay the filing fee within THIRTY DAYS, your case will be filed. You may return your fee waiver and/or payment to any of the Courthouses listed on this notice. Re Lodged Complaint (ghap) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/1/2019: #1 Lodged Complaint, #2 CV-71, #3 CV-60P) (ghap). |
| LODGED COMPLAINT sought to be filed by Plaintiff Thomas E. Andrews. (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
