D. Sidney Potter v. Nick Oldfield et al
D. Sidney Potter |
Computershare, Nick Oldfield, Stuart Irving, Karen Johnson, Talia Ramirez, Adecco USA, Inc. and Computershare, Inc. |
2:2019cv01465 |
February 27, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jacqueline Chooljian |
Dale S Fischer |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 NOTICE of Dismissal Pursuant to FRCP 41(a) or (c) filed by plaintiff D. Sidney Potter. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp) |
Filing 26 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Adecco USA, Inc., re Status Report #25 served on 08/16/19. (Govea, Joseph) |
Filing 25 STATUS REPORT Defendants' 90-Day Joint Status Report (August 16, 2019) filed by Defendant Adecco USA, Inc.. (Govea, Joseph) |
Filing 24 Order DENYING "Motion to Dismiss Defendant's Temporary Stay of Proceedings" (Dkt. No. 22) by Judge Dale S. Fischer. See order for specifics. (lom) |
Filing 23 OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT'S [SIC] TEMPORARY STAY OF PROCEEDINGS OPPOSITION re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #22 filed by Defendants Adecco USA, Inc., Karen Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Declaration OF JOSHUA B. WAGNER, #2 Exhibit EXHIBITS [A thru G])(Wagner, Joshua) |
Filing 22 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant's Temporary Stay of Proceedings filed by plaintiff D. Sidney Potter. (jp) |
Filing 21 ORDER GRANTING Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration, STAYING Proceedings, and DENYING Motion to Transfer Venue (Dkt. #15 ) by Judge Dale S. Fischer. (See document for specifics) (twdb) |
Filing 20 REPLY In Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration #15 filed by Defendants Adecco USA, Inc., Computershare, Inc., Karen Johnson, Nick Oldfield. (Parker, Margaret) |
Filing 19 RESPONSE to Defendant's MOTION to Compel Arbitration or: in the Alternative, Transfer Venue to the District of Arizona and Response to Defendant's Invalid Arbitration Agreement and Motion to Dismiss Defendant's Case Removal to Federal Court #15 filed by Plaintiff D. Sidney Potter. (jp) |
Filing 18 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendants Adecco USA, Inc., Computershare, Inc., Karen Johnson, Nick Oldfield, re Non-Opposition to Motion #17 served on March 28, 2019. (Parker, Margaret) |
Filing 17 NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration #15 filed by Defendants Adecco USA, Inc., Computershare, Inc., Karen Johnson, Nick Oldfield. (Parker, Margaret) |
Filing 16 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendants Adecco USA, Inc., Computershare, Inc., Karen Johnson, Nick Oldfield, re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration #15 served on March 13, 2019. (Parker, Margaret) |
Filing 15 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by Defendants Adecco USA, Inc., Computershare, Inc., Karen Johnson, Nick Oldfield. Motion set for hearing on 4/15/2019 at 01:30 PM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Of Point and Authorities ISO Motion to Compel Arbitration or In the Alternative Transfer Venue to the District of Arizona, #2 Declaration of Margaret A. Parker, #3 Exhibit A - B to Declaration of Margaret A. Parker, #4 Declaration of Rachel Prentiss, #5 Exhibit A - C to Declaration of Rachel Prentiss, #6 Declaration of Thomas Lally, #7 Proposed Order) (Parker, Margaret) |
Filing 14 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' EX PARTE APPLICATION TO ALLOW A BRIEF ONE-WEEK EXTENSION ON THE DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING TOPLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT #12 by Judge Dale S. Fischer. [SEE ORDER FOR SPECIFICS) (et) |
Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendants Computershare, Inc., Nick Oldfield, re EX PARTE APPLICATION to Extend Time to File Answer to 3/13/2019 re Complaint - (Discovery), #12 served on March 5, 2019. (Parker, Margaret) |
Filing 12 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Extend Time to File Answer to 3/13/2019 re Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendants Adecco USA, Inc., Karen Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Margaret Parker, #2 Exhibit A to Declaration of Margaret Parker, #3 Exhibit B to Declaration of Margaret Parker, #4 Proposed Order) (Attorney Margaret A Parker added to party Adecco USA, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Margaret A Parker added to party Karen Johnson(pty:dft)) (Parker, Margaret) |
Filing 11 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi) |
Filing 10 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 16-05. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Ronald S.W. Lew to Judge Dale S. Fischer for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-01465 DSF(JCx). (rn) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: The pro se litigant's email address was added to CM/ECF in error upon the opening of this Notice of Removal case. The pro se litigant's email will be removed from CM/ECF and will not be used for electronic service without the appropriate registration and consent. See Local Rule 53. (car) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S. W. Lew and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (car) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Adecco USA, Inc., Computershare, Inc., Stuart Irving, Karen Johnson, Nick Oldfield, Talia Ramirez. Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff D. Sidney Potter. Filed in State Court on 1/11/19 Submitted with Attachment 2 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendants Computershare, Nick Oldfield, re Notice of Related Case(s) #5 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #3 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #4 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on February 27, 2019. (Parker, Margaret) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendants Computershare, Nick Oldfield. (Parker, Margaret) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Computershare, Nick Oldfield, identifying D. Sidney Potter, Computershare and Nick Oldfield. (Parker, Margaret) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendants Computershare, Nick Oldfield identifying Computershare Limited as Corporate Parent. (Parker, Margaret) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Computershare, Nick Oldfield. (Parker, Margaret) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from California Superior Court Los Angeles County, case number 19STCV00796 Receipt No: 0973-23289575 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendants Computershare, Nick Oldfield. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Margaret A. Parker ISO Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit A and B to Margaret A. Parker's Declaration) (Attorney Margaret A Parker added to party Computershare(pty:dft), Attorney Margaret A Parker added to party Nick Oldfield(pty:dft))(Parker, Margaret) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.