In Re: L. Scott Apparel, Inc.
| Howard Grobstein |
| Lowell Sharron, Beyond Basics LLC and Beyond Basics LLC a California limited liability company doing business as Daily Threads |
| L. Scott Apparel, Inc. |
| 2:2019cv01471 |
| February 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Otis D Wright |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Appellant and Cross-Appellee Lowell Sharron, identifying Beyond Basics, LLC dba Daily Threads. (Mann, Lloyd) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE REGARDING APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. The appeal has been assigned to Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Refer to the Notice for specifics. (jtil) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERRAL OF APPEAL (ADVERSARY) prepared by the United States Bankruptcy Court on 2/26/2019. (jtil) |
| Filing 1 AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL: Filed by Appellant Howard Grobstein Re: Judgment on Trustee's Adversary Complaint against Defendant Lowell Sharron entered on 1/29/2019 by Bankruptcy Judge Robert Kwan, filed in the Bankruptcy Court on 2/26/2019. Bankruptcy Court case number: 2:13- bk-26021-RK, Adversary number: 2:15-ap-01122-RK, BAP case number: N/A. (Attachments: #1 BK Docket) Modified on 3/4/2019 (jtil). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
