Ema Bell v. Vitamin Shoppe, Inc., et al
Ema Bell |
Does 1-10, inclusive and Vitamin Shoppe, Inc. |
2:2019cv01557 |
March 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Manuel L Real |
Michael R Wilner |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 MEMORANDUM in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Certify Order for Interlocutory Appeal #16 filed by Plaintiff Ema Bell. (Smith, Evan) |
Filing 16 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Certify Order for Interlocutory Appeal filed by Plaintiff Ema Bell. Motion set for hearing on 6/3/2019 at 10:00 AM before Judge Manuel L. Real. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Certification of Order for Interlocutory Appeal) (Smith, Evan) |
Filing 15 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION by Judge Manuel L. Real: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration #11 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Counsel shall file a status report with this Court within 14 days of the completion of arbitration. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all dates set in this action are hereby vacated. (gk) |
Filing 14 TEXT ONLY SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Manuel L. Real, The Court has determined that Motion to Compel Arbitration filed by Defendant Vitamin Shoppe, Inc. #11 set for hearing on April 15, 2019 at 10:00 A.M. is suitable for a decision on the papers as filed by all parties without the need for oral argument. Therefore, the said motion is taken UNDER SUBMISSION on the papers as filed and the hearing date of April 15, 2019 is VACATED and TAKEN OFF CALENDAR. The Court will issue its ruling on the matter in due course. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (dbu) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 13 REPLY In Support Of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration #11 And Dismiss Or, In The Alternative, Stay Action filed by Defendant Vitamin Shoppe, Inc.. (Alderfer, Amy) |
Filing 12 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration #11 filed by Plaintiff Ema Bell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration of Ema Bell in Support of Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant Vitamin Shoppe's Motion to Compel Arbtiration and Dismiss Or, In the Alternative, Stay Action, #2 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Denying Defendant Vitamin Shoppe's Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss or in the Alternative, Stay Action)(Smith, Evan) |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by Defendant Vitamin Shoppe, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 4/15/2019 at 10:00 AM before Judge Manuel L. Real. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Amy B. Alderfer, Esq. ISO Defendant Vitamin Shoppe, Inc.'s Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss Or, In the Alternative, Stay Action, #2 Declaration of Carlos Lopez, Esq. ISO Defendant Vitamin Shoppe, Inc.'s Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss Or, In the Alternative, Stay Action, #3 Exhibit Exhibits A-C to Declaration of Carlos Lopez, Esq. ISO Defendant Vitamin Shoppe, Inc.'s Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss Or, In the Alternative, Stay Action, #4 Proposed Order Re Defendant Vitamin Shoppe, Inc.'s Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss Or, In the Alternative, Stay Action) (Alderfer, Amy) |
Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Vitamin Shoppe, Inc., re Notice (Other) #9 served on 3/5/19. (Alderfer, Amy) |
Filing 9 NOTICE Re: Judge Real's Order Re: Notice to Counsel filed by Defendant Vitamin Shoppe, Inc.. (Alderfer, Amy) |
Filing 8 ORDER RE: NOTICE TO COUNSEL upon filing of the complaint by Judge Manuel L. Real. READ CAREFULLY - FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY LEAD TO SANCTIONS. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (cch) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Manuel L. Real and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (esa) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Vitamin Shoppe, Inc., (Taylor, Brett) |
Filing 5 DECLARATION of Carlos Lopez re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Vitamin Shoppe, Inc.. (Taylor, Brett) |
Filing 4 DECLARATION of Brett N. Taylor re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Vitamin Shoppe, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C)(Taylor, Brett) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Vitamin Shoppe, Inc.. (Taylor, Brett) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Vitamin Shoppe, Inc.. (Taylor, Brett) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from State Court County of Los Angeles, case number 19STCV02493 with filing fee previously paid ($400.00 paid on 03-04-2019, receipt number 26FRIPUD), filed by Defendant Vitamin Shoppe, Inc.. (Attorney Brett Nicole Taylor added to party Vitamin Shoppe, Inc.(pty:dft))(Taylor, Brett) |
CONFORMED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE executed by Plaintiff Ema Bell, upon Defendant Vitamin Shoppe, Inc. served on 1/31/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CSC, Agent of Service of Process, in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity. Original Summons NOT returned. (Filed is state court 2/5/19, submitted as document 4, attachment 2, p. 18) (esa) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does 1-10, inclusive, Vitamin Shoppe, Inc., Jury Demand, filed by plaintiff Ema Bell. (Filed in state court 1/28/19, submitted as document 4, attachment 1) (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.