Jamie D. Jefferson v. California Pacific Medical Center
| Jamie D. Jefferson |
| California Pacific Medical Center |
| 2:2019cv01570 |
| March 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S Gutierrez |
| Consuelo B Marshall |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: Denying #3 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis: IT WAS RECOMMENDED that the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis be DENIED by Magistrate Judge Michael R Wilner. Reason: District Court lacks jurisdiction. Legally and/or factually patently frivolous. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: This case is hereby DISMISSED immediately. MD JS-6, Case Terminated. (bm)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: DENYING #3 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). MD JS-6, Case Terminated. (shb)
|
| RECOMMENDATION issued by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. Proposed Order forwarded to the District Judge Gutierrez for approval. Re REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support #3 . (vm) |
|
Filing 6
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Consuelo B. Marshall to Judge Philip S. Gutierrez for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-01570 PSG(MRWx). (rn)
|
| RECOMMENDATION issued by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. Proposed Order forwarded to the District Judge for approval. Re REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support #3 . (vm) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (lh) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support, filed by Plaintiff Jamie D. Jefferson. (lh) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jamie D. Jefferson. (lh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendant California Pacific Medical Center. Case assigned to Judge Consuelo B. Marshall for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Jamie D. Jefferson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jamie D. Jefferson v. California Pacific Medical Center | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: California Pacific Medical Center | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jamie D. Jefferson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
