DIVX, LLC v. Netflix, Inc.
| DIVX, LLC |
| Netflix, Inc. |
| 2:2019cv01602 |
| March 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Philip S Gutierrez |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1338 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 108 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Business or Contact Information: for attorney David M Stein counsel for Plaintiff DIVX, LLC. Changing firm name and address to Brown Rudnick LLP, 2211 Michelson Drive, 7th Floor, Irvine, CA 92612. Changing e-mail to dstein@brownrudnick.com. Filed by Plaintiff DIVX, LLC. (Stein, David) |
| Filing 107 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (bm) |
| Filing 106 MINUTES (In Chambers): The Court GRANTS Defendants' Motions to Stay by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez granting #94 MOTION to Stay Case: For the reasons stated, the Court GRANTS Defendants' motions. These cases are administratively closed. As noted, any party may apply ex parte to reopen the cases as to some or all of the asserted patents (a) after the PTAB has issued preliminary decisions on all of Defendants' pending IPR petitions or (b) after the conclusion of all IPR proceedings. Because these matters are administratively closed by this Order, Hulu's ex parte application to amend the scheduling order in this case (Dkt. no. 120) is MOOT. (see document for further details) (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (bm) |
| Filing 105 NOTICE re Hulu's Ex Parte Application in A Related Case filed by Defendant Netflix, Inc.(a Delaware corporation). (Perlson, David) |
| Filing 104 REPLY in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending Inter Partes Review filed by #94 filed by Defendant Netflix, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of A. Holmes, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(Perlson, David) |
Filing 103
STIPULATED ORDER GOVERNING THE PRODUCTION OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION #101 by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick (es)
|
| Filing 102 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending Inter Partes Review filed by #94 filed by Plaintiff DIVX, LLC, Counter Defendant DIVX, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of A. Fahrenkrog, #2 Exhibit 1 to A. Fahrenkrog Decl., #3 Exhibit 2 to A. Fahrenkrog Decl., #4 Declaration of N. Egnatios)(Fahrenkrog, Aaron) |
| Filing 101 STIPULATION for Order Governing the Production of Electronically Stored Information filed by Plaintiff DIVX, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Fahrenkrog, Aaron) |
|
Filing 100
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER #97 by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick (es)
|
|
Filing 99
ORDER APPOINTING MEDIATOR by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, re Stipulation #98 : Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Hon. Jay C. Gandhi, JAMS, is appointed as mediator in this case. (bm)
|
| Filing 98 STIPULATION for Order Appointing Mediator filed by Plaintiff DIVX, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Fahrenkrog, Aaron) |
| Filing 97 STIPULATION for Protective Order filed by Plaintiff DIVX, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Fahrenkrog, Aaron) |
|
Filing 96
ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, re Stipulation #95 : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the schedule governing this case be modified as follows: Netflix's disclosure of invalidity contentions and accompanying document production [N.D. Cal. Patent L.R. 3-3]: April 2, 2020 (bm)
|
| Filing 95 Joint STIPULATION to Amend Order,, Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings, #89 filed by Defendant Netflix, Inc.(a Delaware corporation). (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Perlson, David) |
| Filing 94 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending Inter Partes Review filed by Netflix, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 5/18/2020 at 01:30 PM before Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Declaration in Support of Netflix's Motion to Stay) (Perlson, David) |
| Filing 93 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT OF CASE filed. Pursuant to docket # 92 filed on 2/28/2020. Case transferred to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick for any discovery matters that are or may be referred by the District Judge. Case number will now read 2:19-cv-01602 PSG(DFMx). (rn) |
| Filing 92 TEXT ONLY ENTRY (In Chambers) by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: Based on the Court's directive, Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick is reassigned to this case. On all documents subsequently filed in this case, please substitute the initials DFM so that the case number will now read: CV 19-1602-PSG (DFMx):THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (wm) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 91 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT OF CASE filed. Pursuant to order filed on 2/20/2020. Case referred to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon for any discovery matters that are or may be referred by the District Judge. Case number will now read 2:19-cv-01602 PSG(AFMx). (rn) |
|
Filing 90
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING MAGISTRATE JUDGE FROM PATENT PILOT PROGRAM; ORDER by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, re Stipulation for Consideration #84 : NOTE CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT. IT IS SO ORDERED. (bm) Modified on 2/20/2020 (bm).
|
|
Filing 89
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, re Joint Report Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan #85 : Discovery cut-off 9/24/2020, Motions due by 12/10/2020, Claim Construction hearing on 8/31/2020 at 01:30 PM, Final Pretrial Conference: 4/12/2021 at 2:30 PM, Trial set for 4/27/2021 at 9:00 AM. Last day to hear dispositive motions and Daubert motions: 2/1/2021 at 1:30 PM (see document for further details) (bm)
|
|
Filing 88
MINUTE ORDER (In Chambers) ORDER by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: The Court sets a trial estimate of seven days in both cases. The Court vacates the February 24th Scheduling Conference. (bm)
|
|
Filing 87
ORDER FOR JURY TRIAL by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/12/2021 02:30 PM. Jury Trial set for 4/27/2021 09:00 AM. (wm)
|
| Filing 86 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Joint Proposed Schedule #85 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Stipulations-Order. Other error(s) with document(s): Docket entry text does not match caption of attached document. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (bm) |
| Filing 85 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan Supplemental Joint Proposed Schedule ; estimated length of trial 2-3 weeks, filed by Counter Defendants DIVX, LLC, DIVX, LLC, Plaintiff DIVX, LLC.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Fahrenkrog, Aaron) |
| Filing 84 Joint STIPULATION for Consideration of Magistrate Judge from Patent Pilot Program filed by defendant Netflix, Inc.(a Delaware corporation).(Yang, Lance) |
| Filing 82 TRANSCRIPT ORDER as to plaintiff DIVX, LLC(a Delaware limited liability company) for Court Reporter. Court will contact Kia Schmeckpeper at KSchmeckpeper@RobinsKaplan.com with further instructions regarding this order. Transcript preparation will not begin until payment has been satisfied with the court reporter. (Tremblay, Emily) |
|
Filing 83
MINUTE ORDER (In Chambers): Order Setting Claim Construction-Related Dates and Trial Date by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: As discussed at the Scheduling Conference on January 27, 2020, the Court enters the following dates and procedures in this case: Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement that complies with the requirements of N.D. Cal. Patent L.R. 4-3(a), (b), (c) (up to a maximum of 15 most significant terms rather than 10), (d), (e), (f).: June 11, 2020; Simultaneous Opening Claim Construction Briefs, not to exceed 30 pages combined total for both cases. No more than 15 claim terms combined total for both cases may be presented for construction in claim construction briefs unless leave is sought and granted by Court at least 10 days before opening briefs are due and for good cause shown.:July 9, 2020; Simultaneous Responsive Claim Construction Briefs, not to exceed 15 pages combined total for both cases. Parties must seek leave of Court by this date as to any demonstrative materials, such as PowerPoint slides, they would seek to use at the Claim Construction Hearing to support their claim construction positions, including by submitting the proposed materials themselves for consideration. Late-disclosed demonstratives be permitted at the hearing. Parties are also directed to email chambers a word processing document that includes a chart with columns for: (1) the disputed claim terms (with an identification of which asserted claims each term appears in), (2) Plaintiffs proposed construction for each term, (3) Defendants proposed construction for each term, and (4) the Courts construction for each term (to be filled in by Court):August 6, 2020; Claim Construction Hearing: August 31, 2020 at 1:30pm; Pretrial: April 12, 2021 at 2:30pm; Trial: April 27, 2021 at 9:00am; As further discussed at the Scheduling Conference, the parties are directed to meet and confer and file a joint stipulation with attached proposed order that includes updated proposals for all other pretrial dates in this matter, as well as procedures for narrowing the number of asserted claims and prior art grounds in this case. (bm)
|
| Filing 81 MINUTES OF Scheduling Conference held before Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: Cause called; appearances made. Scheduling conference is not held. Court and counsel confer about the status of the case. The Court instructs counsel to meet and confer and then stipulate to a magistrate judge participating in the Patent Pilot Program. Either a stipulation or a notice that the parties are unable to agree upon a particular magistrate judge must be filed by next week. In addition, counsel are instructed to discuss narrowing the number of claims prior to claims construction and the appropriate time to schedule mediation. Court continues the scheduling conferences to February 24, 2020, at 2:00 p.m., with a joint status report due by February 18, 2020. Order to issue. Court Reporter: Marea Woolrich. (bm) |
| Filing 80 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 2-3 weeks, filed by Plaintiff DIVX, LLC, Counter Defendant DIVX, LLC.. (Fahrenkrog, Aaron) |
| Filing 79 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Counterclaim #78 . The following error(s) was/were found: Caption of document is incomplete/incorrect. Other error(s) with document(s): Caption of Answer to Counterclaim does not also include additional counterclaim caption. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (bm) |
| Filing 78 ANSWER to Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), Counterclaim #76 with JURY DEMAND filed by Plaintiff DIVX, LLC(a Delaware limited liability company).(Fahrenkrog, Aaron) |
|
Filing 77
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Scheduling Conference set for 1/27/2020 at 02:00 PM. (wm)
|
| Filing 76 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition,, #60 with JURY DEMAND, COUNTERCLAIM against DIVX, LLC filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Netflix, Inc..(Yang, Lance) |
| Filing 74 ANSWER to Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), Counterclaim #73 with JURY DEMAND filed by Plaintiff DIVX, LLC.(Fahrenkrog, Aaron) |
|
Filing 75
ORDER by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: the following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order: Answer #73 , for the following reasons: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Certification of Interested Parties and/or no copies. (bm)
|
| Filing 73 DOCUMENT STRICKEN ON 11/25/19. ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition,, #60 with JURY DEMAND, COUNTERCLAIM against DIVX, LLC filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Netflix, Inc..(Yang, Lance) Modified on 11/27/2019 (bm). |
| Filing 72 MINUTES (In Chambers): The Court DENIES Defendants' Motions to Dismiss the FACs WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez denying #61 MOTION to Dismiss: For the reasons stated, the Court DENIES Defendants' Motions WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (see document for further details) (bm) |
| Filing 71 TEXT ONLY ENTRY (In Chambers) by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez : DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS #61 set for hearing on 11/04/19 is taken under submission and off calendar. Accordingly, no appearance by counsel is necessary. The Court will issue a ruling after full consideration of the submitted pleadings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (wm) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
|
Filing 70
ORDER re STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION REGARDING USE OF ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT AT THE NOVEMBER 4, 2019 HEARING by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, re Stipulation #69 : DENIED. (bm)
|
| Filing 69 STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION REGARDING USE OF ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint #61 filed by Defendant Netflix, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Yang, Lance) |
| Filing 68 REPLY in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint #61 filed by Defendant Netflix, Inc.. (Yang, Lance) |
| Filing 67 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint #61 filed by Plaintiff DIVX, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Fahrenkrog, Aaron) |
| Filing 66 TRANSCRIPT ORDER for Court Reporter. Court will contact Jill Parrott at jparrott@robinskaplan.com with further instructions regarding this order. Transcript preparation will not begin until payment has been satisfied with the court reporter. (ha) |
| Filing 65 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: MOTION to Dismiss #61 by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. The document is accepted as filed. (wm) |
|
Filing 64
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS re Order Modifying Briefing Schedule for Oppositions and Replies to Defendants' Pending Motions to Dismiss by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: Defendants have filed motions to dismiss the first amended complaints in this case, which are set for hearing on November 4, 2019 at 1:30 pm. Netflix Motion, CV 19-1602, Dkt. no. 62; Hulu Motion, CV 19-1606, Dkt. no. 60. Having considered the Motions, the Court ORDERS that the oppositions to the Motions be filed no later than September 30, 2019 and that the replies to the Motions be filed no later than October 7, 2019. See C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-2 (requirements of Local Rule 7, including local rule deadlines to file opposition and reply, are applicable "unless otherwise ordered by the Court."). (bm)
|
| Filing 63 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney David M Stein counsel for Plaintiff DIVX, LLC. Adding David M. Stein as counsel of record for DivX, LLC for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff DivX, LLC. (Attorney David M Stein added to party DIVX, LLC(pty:pla))(Stein, David) |
| Filing 62 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Motion to Dismiss #61 . The following error(s) was/were found: Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or not timely. Other error(s) with document(s): Motion is noticed for a date that is closed on the court's calendar. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (bm) |
| Filing 61 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Defendant Netflix, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 11/4/2019 at 01:30 PM before Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Yang, Lance) |
| Filing 60 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Netflix, Inc. amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , filed by Plaintiff DIVX, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, part 1, #12 Exhibit 11, part 2, #13 Exhibit 12, #14 Exhibit 13, #15 Exhibit 14, part 1, #16 Exhibit 14, part 2, #17 Exhibit 15, #18 Exhibit 16, #19 Exhibit 17)(Fahrenkrog, Aaron) |
| Filing 59 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) The Court GRANTS the motions IN PART as to the patents challenged under 35 U.S.C. Section 101 and DENIES the motions IN PART as to the induced infringement claims by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez granting in part and denying in part #44 MOTION to Dismiss Case: For the reasons stated, the Court GRANTS-IN-PART Defendants' Motions as it relates to each of the challenged patents based on insufficient allegations in Plaintiff's Complaints to support its factual assertions in its oppositions. Plaintiff is permitted leave to file amended complaints. Failure to file amended complaints will result in a dismissal with prejudice. Any amended complaint must be filed by August 21, 2019. The Court DENIES-IN-PART Defendants' Motions as to their challenge to the Complaints' induced infringement allegations. (see document for further details) (bm) |
| Filing 58 MINUTES OF HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS CASE Hearing held before Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: Case is called and appearances are made. Hearing on the Motions to Dismiss (dkt. #44 in 19cv1602; dkt. #47 in 19cv1606). Argument is heard. The matter is taken under submission. The Court's ruling will issue. Court Reporter: Marea Woolrich. (bm) |
| Filing 57 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #44 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Fahrenkrog, Aaron) |
| Filing 56 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #44 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Yang, Lance) |
|
Filing 55
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION REGARDING USE OF ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT AT THE JULY 29, 2019HEARING by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, re Stipulation #54 : Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and for good cause shown,the Court permits the use of electronic equipment in the courtroom for the July 29,2019 hearing.NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT. Pursuant to the stipulations of the parties and for good cause shown, the Court permits the use of electronic equipment in the courtroom for the July 29, 2019 hearing. The Court ORDERS that any demonstrative a party intends to use at the hearing, for instance, PowerPoint slides, must be served on opposing counsel and lodged with the Court by noon on July 25, 2019. Demonstratives that are not exchanged and lodged by that date and time may not be used at the hearing. The parties are further advised that they should anticipate significant limits on the amount of time that they will be permitted to present oral argument at the hearing. (bm)
|
| Filing 54 STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION REGARDING USE OF ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #44 filed by Defendant Netflix, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Yang, Lance) |
|
Filing 53
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS Order Continuing Hearing Date on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Case by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: Having considered the Motion, the Court CONTINUES the hearing on the Motion, currently scheduled for July 15, 2019 at 10:00 a.m., to July 29, 2019 at 1:30 p.m. such that it can be heard consistent with this Courts motion calendar and concurrently with the motion to dismiss that is scheduled in Case No. CV 19-1606 PSG (JPRx). (bm)
|
|
Filing 52
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji)
|
| Filing 51 REPLY IN SUPPORT OF NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #44 filed by Defendant Netflix, Inc.. (Yang, Lance) |
| Filing 50 SUPPLEMENT to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #44 NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF DIVX, LLCS RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS filed by Plaintiff DIVX, LLC. (Allender, Daniel) |
|
Filing 49
ORDER TRANSFERRING CIVIL ACTION pursuant General Order 19-03. ORDER case transferred from Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald to the calendar of Judge Philip S. Gutierrez for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-01602 PSG(JCx). Signed by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (rn)
|
| Filing 48 DECLARATION of Aaron R. Fahrenkrog in opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #44 filed by Plaintiff DIVX, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Fahrenkrog, Aaron) |
| Filing 47 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #44 filed by Plaintiff DIVX, LLC. (Fahrenkrog, Aaron) |
| Filing 46 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) DISCLOSURE TO THE PARTIES by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. In this case, the Court believes that disqualification is neither necessary nor desirable. The Court was unaware of the purchases of the shares when they occurred. The Court made no substantive rulings during the period of ownership. The shares were divested under 455(f). The Court does not view this single matter as plausibly affecting the market price of Netflix stock. (iv) |
| Filing 45 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #44 filed by Defendant Netflix, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Yang, Lance) |
| Filing 44 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Netflix, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 7/15/2019 at 10:00 AM before Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Yang, Lance) |
| Filing 43 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Netflix, Inc. (Yang, Lance) |
| Filing 42 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Netflix, Inc.. Related Case(s): DivX, LLC v. Hulu, LLC, No. 2:19-cv-01606-PSG-JPR (Yang, Lance) |
|
Filing 41
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT AND PAGE LIMIT #38 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Defendant Netflix, Inc.'s time to respond to the Complaint is extended to and including May 31, 2019; and the memorandum of points and authorities for its Rule 12(b)(6) motion shall not exceed 35 pages in length, excluding indices and exhibits. (iv)
|
| Filing 40 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Valerie Anne Lozano counsel for Defendant Netflix, Inc.. Adding Valerie A. Lozano as counsel of record for Netflix, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Netflix, Inc.. (Attorney Valerie Anne Lozano added to party Netflix, Inc.(pty:dft))(Lozano, Valerie) |
| Filing 39 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Brian P Biddinger counsel for Defendant Netflix, Inc.. Adding Brian P. Biddinger as counsel of record for Netflix, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Netflix, Inc.. (Attorney Brian P Biddinger added to party Netflix, Inc.(pty:dft))(Biddinger, Brian) |
| Filing 38 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to May 31, 2019 filed by Defendant Netflix, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Yang, Lance) |
| Filing 37 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Andrew M Holmes counsel for Defendant Netflix, Inc.. Adding Andrew M. Holmes as counsel of record for Netflix, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Netflix, Inc.. (Attorney Andrew M Holmes added to party Netflix, Inc.(pty:dft))(Holmes, Andrew) |
| Filing 36 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Lance Yang counsel for Defendant Netflix, Inc.. Adding Lance L. Yang as counsel of record for Netflix, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Netflix, Inc.. (Attorney Lance Yang added to party Netflix, Inc.(pty:dft))(Yang, Lance) |
| Filing 35 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney David A Perlson counsel for Defendant Netflix, Inc.. Adding David A. Perlson as counsel of record for Netflix, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Netflix, Inc.. (Attorney David A Perlson added to party Netflix, Inc.(pty:dft))(Perlson, David) |
|
Filing 34
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY MORE THAN 30 DAYS #33 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. The time for defendant Netflix Inc. to respond to the complaint is continued to May 17, 2019. (iv)
|
| Filing 33 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 5/17/2019 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiff DIVX, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Allender, Daniel) |
| Filing 32 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff DIVX, LLC, upon Defendant Netflix, Inc. served on 3/12/2019, answer due 4/2/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Carlos Paz, CT Corporation System, Authorized Agent for Service of Process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. Additional documents served: Civil Case Cover Sheet; Notice of Interested Parties; Notice of Assignment to United States Judge; Notice of Court Directed ADR Program (Allender, Daniel) |
| Filing 31 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Netflix, Inc. (iv) |
| Filing 30 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiff DIVX, LLC. (Allender, Daniel) |
| Filing 29 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #12 . The following error(s) was found: The date and signature line must be left blank. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (iv) |
|
Filing 28
ORDER by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald: Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Emily J. Tremblay to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff DIVX, LLC, designating Daniel L. Allender as local counsel #20 . (iv)
|
|
Filing 27
ORDER by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald: Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney William E. Maske to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff DIVX, LLC, designating Daniel L. Allender as local counsel #19 . (iv)
|
|
Filing 26
ORDER by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald: Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Shui Li to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff DIVX, LLC, designating Daniel L. Allender as local counsel #18 . (iv)
|
|
Filing 25
ORDER by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald: Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Aaron R. Fahrenkrog to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff DIVX, LLC, designating Daniel L. Allender as local counsel #17 . (iv)
|
|
Filing 24
ORDER by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald: Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Bryan J. Mechell to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff DIVX, LLC, designating Daniel L. Allender as local counsel #16 . (iv)
|
|
Filing 23
ORDER by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald: Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Rajin S. Olson to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff DIVX, LLC, designating Daniel L. Allender as local counsel #15 . (iv)
|
|
Filing 22
ORDER by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald: Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Mary Pheng to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff DIVX, LLC, designating Daniel L. Allender as local counsel #14 . (iv)
|
|
Filing 21
ORDER by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald: Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Christopher A. Seidl to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff DIVX, LLC, designating Daniel L. Allender as local counsel #13 . (iv)
|
| Filing 20 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Emily J. Tremblay to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff DIVX, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-23339345) filed by Plaintiff DIVX, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Allender, Daniel) |
| Filing 19 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney William E. Manske to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff DIVX, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-23337650) filed by Plaintiff DIVX, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Allender, Daniel) |
| Filing 18 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Shui Li to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff DIVX, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-23337516) filed by Plaintiff DIVX, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Allender, Daniel) |
| Filing 17 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Aaron R. Fahrenkrog to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff DIVX, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-23337389) filed by Plaintiff DIVX, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Allender, Daniel) |
| Filing 16 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Bryan J. Mechell to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff DIVX, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-23337279) filed by Plaintiff DIVX, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Allender, Daniel) |
| Filing 15 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Rajin S. Olson to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff DIVX, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-23337140) filed by Plaintiff DIVX, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Allender, Daniel) |
| Filing 14 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Mary Pheng to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff DIVX, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-23337020) filed by Plaintiff DIVX, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Allender, Daniel) |
| Filing 13 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Christopher A. Seidl to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff DIVX, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-23336750) filed by Plaintiff DIVX, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Allender, Daniel) |
| Filing 12 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff DIVX, LLC. (Silberfeld, Roman) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons. The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (jtil) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Bryan J. Mechell. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jtil) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Aaron R. Fahrenkrog. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jtil) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Christopher A. Seidl. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by DIVX, LLC. (Silberfeld, Roman) |
| Filing 4 Certificate and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff DIVX, LLC, identifying DivX CF Investors LLC. (Silberfeld, Roman) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff DIVX, LLC. (Silberfeld, Roman) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff DIVX, LLC. (Silberfeld, Roman) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23319837 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff DIVX, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8) (Attorney Roman M Silberfeld added to party DIVX, LLC(pty:pla))(Silberfeld, Roman) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
