Thee Aguila, Inc. et al v. Penn Star Insurance Company
| Thee Aguila, Inc. and Henry Aguila |
| PENN-STAR INSURANCE COMPANY, a Pennsylvania corporation, DOES 1-10, inclusive and Penn Star Insurance Company |
| 2:2019cv01621 |
| March 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S Gutierrez |
| Frederick F Mumm |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
JOINT RULE 26(F) REPORT REPORT of Joint Rule 26(f) Report filed by Defendant Penn Star Insurance Company. (Hurwitz, Andres)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Scheduling Conference set for 12/2/2019 at 02:00 PM. (wm)
|
|
Filing 13
ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Penn Star Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties)(Hurwitz, Andres)
|
|
Filing 12
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) The Court DENIES Defendant's motion to dismiss and motion to strike by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez denying #9 MOTION: Accordingly, the Court DENIES Defendant's motions. (see document for further details) (bm)
|
|
Filing 11
REPLY in support NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's Claim for Punitive Damages #9 in support of Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Penn Star Insurance Company. (Hurwitz, Andres)
|
|
Filing 10
OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS SECOND CLAIM in opposition re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's Claim for Punitive Damages #9 Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Claim filed by Plaintiffs Henry Aguila, Thee Aguila, Inc.. (Nong, Julie)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's Claim for Punitive Damages filed by Defendant Penn Star Insurance Company. Motion set for hearing on 9/9/2019 at 01:30 PM before Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Certification As to Interested Parties, #3 Demand for Jury Trial, #4 Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Claim, #5 Proposed Order, #6 Proposed Order) (Attorney Andres C Hurwitz added to party Penn Star Insurance Company(pty:dft)) (Hurwitz, Andres)
|
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji)
|
|
Filing 7
21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Penn Star Insurance Company. (jtil)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (jtil)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Thee Aguila, Inc. and Henry Aguila Henry Aguila, Thee Aguila, Inc.. (Nong, Julie)
|
|
Filing 3
Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiffs Thee Aguila, Inc. and Henry Aguila Henry Aguila, Thee Aguila, Inc.. (Nong, Julie)
|
|
Filing 2
Civil Cover Sheet with filing fee previously paid (400 paid on 03/05/2019, receipt number 0973-23322842), filed by Plaintiffs Thee Aguila, Inc. and Henry Aguila Thee Aguila, Inc..(Nong, Julie)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23322842 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs Thee Aguila, Inc. and Henry Aguila Thee Aguila, Inc.. (Attorney Julie N Nong added to party Thee Aguila, Inc.(pty:pla))(Nong, Julie)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
