Roberta Edrick v. Air Tahiti Nui
Roberta Edrick |
Air Tahiti Nui |
2:2019cv01633 |
March 6, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Charles F Eick |
John F Walter |
Airplane |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 12 AIR TAHITI NUI'S CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Air Tahiti Nui, identifying Government of French Polynesia and various insurance underwriters in the international insurance market. (Attorney Kevin R Sutherland added to party Air Tahiti Nui(pty:dft))(Sutherland, Kevin) |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPLICABILITY OF FOREIGN SOVEREIGN IMMUNITIES ACT filed by defendant Air Tahiti Nui. (Sutherland, Kevin) |
Filing 10 DECLARATION of Brian F. Needelman re: compliance with general order authorizing electronic filing filed by Plaintiff Roberta Edrick. (Needelman, Brian) |
Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Air Tahiti Nui. (iv) |
![]() |
Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #3 , Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #4 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #6 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by Plaintiff Roberta Edrick. (Needelman, Brian) |
Filing 6 Certification and notice of interested parties of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Roberta Edrick, (Needelman, Brian) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (ghap) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (ghap) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Roberta Edrick. (Needelman, Brian) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23326620 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Roberta Edrick. (Attorney Brian Fred Needelman added to party Roberta Edrick(pty:pla))(Needelman, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Roberta Edrick v. Air Tahiti Nui | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Roberta Edrick | |
Represented By: | Brian Fred Needelman |
Represented By: | Thomas J Johnston |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Air Tahiti Nui | |
Represented By: | Kevin R Sutherland |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.