Alfredo Valencia v. Ronald Davis

Petitioner: Alfredo Valencia
Respondent: Ronald Davis
Case Number: 2:2019cv01797
Filed: March 12, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Michael W Fitzgerald
Nature of Suit: Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 12, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT and Commencement of Capital Habeas Corpus Case. This capital habeas case was initiated on 3/12/19 and has been assigned to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald for all further proceedings. (esa)
March 12, 2019 Filing 1 REQUEST for Appointment of Counsel in California Death Sentence Case and for Stay of Execution of Death Sentence; DECLARATION of Alfredo Valencia filed by petitioner Alfredo Valencia. (Attachments: #1 Lodged Proposed Order) (esa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alfredo Valencia v. Ronald Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ronald Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Alfredo Valencia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?