Robert Lee Manning Jr. v. The Boeing Company et al
Robert Lee Manning, Jr. |
The Boeing Company, Juarez Eric Conley, American Airlines Group, Inc., Does 1 through 10 and Boeing Aircraft Company |
2:2019cv01806 |
March 12, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Andre Birotte |
John E McDermott |
Airplane |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1396 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (car) |
Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Robert Lee Manning, Jr. (car) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Robert Lee Manning, Jr (car) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants American Airlines Group, Inc., Boeing Aircraft Company, Juarez Eric Conley, Does 1-10, The Boeing Company. Case assigned to Judge Andre Birotte Jr for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff Robert Lee Manning, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (car) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/13/2019: #2 Summons) (car). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.