John J. Kleinhans et al v. William Woo et al
Plaintiff: Mary Catherine Kleinhans and John J Kleinhans
Defendant: Jushi Group Company Limited, China Jushi Group Company Limited, William Woo and Does 1-100
Case Number: 2:2019cv01911
Filed: March 15, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Philip S Gutierrez
Referring Judge: Rozella A Oliver
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 15, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): The Civil Cover Sheet and Notice of Interested Parties are attached to the Notice of Removal. Each of these documents should have been filed and entered separately under its correct event/relief. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (esa)
March 15, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Rodney Jack Reynolds. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (esa)
March 15, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Vincent E. Morgan. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (esa)
March 15, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney S. Reed Morgan. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (esa)
March 15, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
March 15, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (esa)
March 15, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 19STCV05067 Receipt No: 0973-23379184 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Jushi Group Company Limited, China Jushi Group Company Limited. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Part 1 - Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit Part 2 - Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #3 Exhibit Part 3 - Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #4 Exhibit Exhibit B - State Court Docket, #5 Exhibit Exhibit C - State Court Civil Case Cover Sheet, #6 Exhibit Exhibit D - State Court Civil Case Cover Sheet Addendum and Statement of Location, #7 Exhibit Exhibit E - State Court Notice of Case Assignment, Unlimited Civil Case, #8 Exhibit Exhibit F - State Court Standing Order re: Personal Injury Procedures, #9 Exhibit Exhibit G - State Court Notice of Related Case, #10 Declaration Declaration of Wang Rui, #11 Exhibit Exhibit A to Declaration of Wang Rui, #12 Declaration Declaration of Liao Xinlin, #13 Exhibit Exhibit A to Declaration of Liao Xinlin, #14 Declaration Declaration of William Woo, #15 Certification of Interested Parties, #16 Notice of Pendency of Other Actions, #17 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Stacie D Yee added to party China Jushi Group Company Limited(pty:dft), Attorney Stacie D Yee added to party Jushi Group Company Limited(pty:dft))(Yee, Stacie)
March 15, 2019 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants China Jushi Group Company Limited, Does 1-100, Jushi Group Company Limited, William Woo, Jury Demand, filed by plaintiffs John J Kleinhans, Mary Catherine Kleinhans. (Filed in state court 2/14/19, submitted as document 1 attachment 1) (esa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: John J. Kleinhans et al v. William Woo et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary Catherine Kleinhans
Represented By: David M Glenn
Represented By: Ari Emanuel Moss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John J Kleinhans
Represented By: David M Glenn
Represented By: Ari Emanuel Moss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jushi Group Company Limited
Represented By: Benjamin Eli Strauss
Represented By: Stacie D Yee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: China Jushi Group Company Limited
Represented By: Benjamin Eli Strauss
Represented By: Stacie D Yee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Woo
Represented By: Benjamin Eli Strauss
Represented By: Stacie D Yee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-100
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?