Ryan Morrison v. City of Los Angeles, California et al
| Ryan Morrison |
| Michael Boylls, David Mirzoyan, Los Angeles Police Department, City of Los Angeles, California, DOES 1 through 13 inclusive, Richardo Acosta, Jeffrey Megee and Alvaro Ramos |
| 2:2019cv01961 |
| March 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jesus G Bernal |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth: granting #3 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (sbou)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (jtil)
|
|
Filing 3
REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Ryan Morrison. (jtil)
|
|
Filing 2
CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Ryan Morrison. (jtil)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Ryan Morrison against Defendants Richardo Acosta, Michael Boylls, City of Los Angeles, California, Los Angeles Police Department, Jeffrey Megee, David Mirzoyan, Alvaro Ramos. Case assigned to Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (Attachments: #1 CV71) (jtil)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
