Mal Kim v. Bonjour Fete, Inc. et al
| MAL KIM |
| BONJOUR FETE, INC., DOES 1 through 10 and J AND P GUMBINER TRUST |
| 2:2019cv01992 |
| March 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John E McDermott |
| George H Wu |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER RE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE JUDGE GEORGE H. WU by Judge George H. Wu. See document for details. (gk)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Bonjour Fete, Inc., J and P Gumbiner Trust. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff MAL KIM, (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff MAL KIM. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff MAL KIM. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23392232 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff MAL KIM. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party MAL KIM(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
