United States of America v. Joseph D. Rista
| U.S.A. and United States of America |
| JOSEPH D. RISTA and Joseph D Rista |
| Phyllis G Pollack |
| 2:2019cv02000 |
| March 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| William D Keller |
| Alexander F MacKinnon |
| Contract: Recovery Student Loan |
| 20 U.S.C. ยง 1080 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 MEDIATION REPORT Filed by Mediator (ADR Panel) Phyllis G Pollack: Mediation held on July 9, 2019. The parties are unable to reach an agreement at this time.Counsel: Please evaluate the effectiveness of the ADR Program by completing a survey on your mediation experience. To access the survey, click on the following link: #MediationParticipantSurvey(Pollack, Phyllis) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF MEDIATION DATE filed. Mediation set for July 9, 2019 at 2:30 p.m. at 865 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 1388, Los Angeles, CA 90017..(Pollack, Phyllis) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Panel Mediator. Mediator (ADR Panel) Phyllis G Pollack has been assigned to serve as Panel Mediator. (mb) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (smo) |
Filing 10
MINUTE IN CHAMBERS ORDER REFERRING MATTER TO ADR COORDINATOR FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE by Judge William D. Keller: Pursuant to Local Rule 16-15.1 et seq., the parties in all civil cases must participate in an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) process prior to trial. The Court has reviewed the complaint and answer, and refers this matter to the Courts ADR Coordinator, 213.894.1215), for a settlement conference. The settlement conference must occur no later than ninety (90) days from the date of this order. In addition, the parties shall file a joint report indicating whether the case settled, or not, no later than seven (7) days after the settlement conference is completed. (shb)
|
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Joseph D. Rista, (shb) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint on Promissory Note (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Joseph D. Rista.(shb) |
| Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff United States of America, upon Defendant Joseph D. Rista served on 3/21/2019, answer due 4/11/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon JOSEPH D. RISTA WAS SUB-SERVED TO JOHA- HIS WIFE,F,CAUC,5'5",130LBS,HAIR LONG BROWN,IN 40'S in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Goldsmith, Stephen) |
| Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Joseph D. Rista. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge William D. Keller and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 filed by PLAINTIFF U.S.A.. (Goldsmith, Stephen) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by PLAINTIFF U.S.A., identifying JOSEPH D. RISTA-DEFENADNT. (Goldsmith, Stephen) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff U.S.A.. (Goldsmith, Stephen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT No Fee Required - US Government, filed by PLAINTIFF U.S.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Attorney Stephen R Goldsmith added to party U.S.A.(pty:pla))(Goldsmith, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
