Rochelle Bates v. US Bancorp
ROCHELLE BATES |
US BANCORP dba U.S. BANK, US Bancorp and US Bancorp doing business as U.S. Bank |
2:2019cv02182 |
March 22, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Gail J Standish |
John F Walter |
Cable/Satellite TV |
47 U.S.C. § 0227 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal Rochelle Bates. (Bontrager, Nicholas) |
Filing 17 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS: ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge John F. Walter: In the Notice of Settlement filed on May 10, 2019, Dkt. No. 16, the parties represent that they have settled this action. As a result, the Court dismisses this action without prejudice subject to either party reopening the action on or before July 8, 2019. The Court will retain jurisdiction for the sole purpose of enforcing the settlement until July 8, 2019. Thereafter, absent further order of the Court, the dismissal of this action will be with prejudice. All dates in this action, including the trial date are vacated. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (bm) |
Filing 16 NOTICE of Settlement Rochelle Bates. (Bontrager, Nicholas) |
Filing 15 DECLARATION of Michael Jaeger re Order #12 Re: Compliance with Local Rules Governing Electronic Filing filed by Defendant US Bancorp. (Jaeger, Michael) |
Filing 14 ORDER GRANTING FIRST STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT #13 by Judge John F. Walter. Defendant U.S. Bank shall file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before May 17, 2019. (lom) |
Filing 13 First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to US Bancorp answer now due 5/17/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant US Bancorp. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Michael Jaeger added to party US Bancorp(pty:dft))(Jaeger, Michael) |
Filing 12 STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (lom) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Rochelle Bates, upon Defendant US Bancorp served on 3/29/2019, answer due 4/19/2019. in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Bontrager, Nicholas) |
Filing 10 DECLARATION of G. Thomas Martin, III of Lead Counsel Re: Compliance With Local Rules Governing Electronic Filing filed by Plaintiff Rochelle Bates. (Martin, George) |
Filing 9 DECLARATION of Nicholas J. Bontrager of Lead Counsel Re: Compliance with Local Rules filed by Plaintiff Rochelle Bates. (Bontrager, Nicholas) |
Filing 8 STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant US Bancorp. (et) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (et) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties (Bontrager, Nicholas) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff ROCHELLE BATES. (Bontrager, Nicholas) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 ROCHELLE BATES. (Bontrager, Nicholas) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23426845 - Fee: $400. (Attorney Nicholas J Bontrager added to party ROCHELLE BATES(pty:pla))(Bontrager, Nicholas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.