Rafael Arroyo, Jr. v. Bharati Bhattarai et al
| Rafael Arroyo, Jr. |
| Does 1-10, Bharat Bhattarai and Petroleum Management and Marketing, Inc. |
| 2:2019cv02238 |
| March 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Otis D Wright |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Petroleum Management and Marketing, Inc., upon Defendant Petroleum Management and Marketing, Inc. served on 5/20/2019, answer due 6/10/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Porschia (Doe_- person in charge at the time of service in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Carson, Chris) |
Filing 18
ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: granting #16 APPLICATION to Stay Case re Early Mediation ADA Disability Access Litigation as to Petroleum Management & Marketing, Inc. The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than 8/12/2019. (lc)
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: granting #15 APPLICATION to Stay Case re Early Mediation ADA Disability Access Litigation as to Bharat Bhattarai. The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than 8/12/2019. (lc)
|
| Filing 16 APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by Defendant Petroleum Management and Marketing, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Signed Application) (Carmack, Harry) |
| Filing 15 APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by Defendant Bharat Bhattarai. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Carmack, Harry) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: the following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order: Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #11 , Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #10 , for the following reasons: Incorrect document is attached to the docket entry; incorrect event, correct event: Application: Stay Case and Early Mediation. Proposed document not submitted as separate attachment. Counsel is reminded to review the rules for filing documents and comply with instructions given on discrepancy, docket no. 12. (lc)
|
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Rafael Arroyo, Jr., upon Defendant Bharat Bhattarai served on 4/26/2019, answer due 5/17/2019. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #11 , Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #10 by Bharat Bhattarai and Petroleum Management and Marketing, Inc. The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Application: Stay Case and Early Mediation (ADR-21). Other error(s) with document(s): The incorrect event does not provide the relief sought. Missing the corresponding proposed order form (available on court website : ADR 22 ); Note: To assist in a search for correct events, please use the "SEARCH" option for a "key word" to narrow the selection process. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 ADA Application for Stay filed by Defendant Petroleum Management and Marketing, Inc..(Attorney Harry S Carmack added to party Petroleum Management and Marketing, Inc.(pty:dft))(Carmack, Harry) Modified on 5/6/2019 (lc). (STRICKEN PER 5/6/19 ORDER) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 ADA Application for Stay.(Attorney Harry S Carmack added to party Bharat Bhattarai(pty:dft))(Carmack, Harry) Modified on 5/6/2019 (lc). (STRICKEN PER 5/6/19 ORDER) |
| Filing 9 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (lom) |
|
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central District's website for additional information. See document for details. (lom)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendants Bharat Bhattarai, Petroleum Management and Marketing, Inc. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (esa) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Rafael Arroyo, Jr.. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Rafael Arroyo, Jr., (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Rafael Arroyo, Jr.. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23438759 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Rafael Arroyo, Jr.. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Rafael Arroyo, Jr.(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
