Constantine Nichola Papanicolaou et al v. Sharon Palmer et al
| Constantine Papanicolaou, Jolene Papanicolaou and Constantine Nichola Papanicolaou |
| DOES 10 through 50, inclusive,, Jennifer Prince, Healthy Farms, Larry Otting, Sharon Palmer, Does 1 through 50, inclusive and Sharon Palmer an individual doing business as Healthy Family Farms |
| 2:2019cv02265 |
| March 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Ventura County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Ventura County Superior Court. (lom) |
Filing 10
ORDER ON STIPULATION #8 DISMISSING EIGHT CAUSE OF ACTION FOR RELIEF FOR R.I.CO. (18 U.S.C. 1961) WITH PREJUDICE AND REMANDING ACTION TO STATE COURT #8 by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case remanded to Ventura County Superior Court, Case number 56-02017-00499246. Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (lom)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Ronald S.W. Lew to Judge Fernando M. Olguin for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-02265 FMO (MRWx). (esa)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION to Remand Case to State Court filed by Defendant Larry Otting(an individual ).(Ecoff, Lawrence) |
| Filing 7 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Larry Otting. (Ecoff, Lawrence) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: The Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)is missing or incomplete. All civil actions presented for filing must be accompanied by a completed Civil Cover Sheet. See Local Rule 3-1. Counsel must file a completed Civil Cover Sheet immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S. W. Lew and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (car) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Larry Otting, (Ecoff, Lawrence) |
| Filing 2 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Larry Otting, of Notice to Adverse Party of Removal to Federal Court served on March 27, 2019. (Ecoff, Lawrence) |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 50, inclusve, Larry Otting(an individual ), Larry Otting(as Trustee of the Larry Otting Trust ), Sharon Palmer, Jennifer Prince(and individual ), Jennifer Prince(as Trustee of the Larry Otting Trust ), filed by plaintiffs Jolene Papanicolaou, Constantine Nichola Papanicolaou. Submitted with Attachment 1 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from California, case number 56-2017-00499246-CU-OR-VTA Receipt No: 0973-23445246 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Larry Otting. (Attachments: #1 First Amended Complaint, #2 Summons First Amended Complaint) (Attorney Lawrence C Ecoff added to party Larry Otting(pty:dft))(Ecoff, Lawrence) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
