Calvin D. Jackson v. D. Ramos et al
| Calvin D Jackson |
| Engels, C Wu, J. Buendia, E. Jordan, B. Ramos and D. Ramos |
| 2:2019cv02288 |
| March 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F Eick |
| John F Walter |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Amended Complaint #6 as to All Defendants. (sp) |
Filing 8
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. The U.S. Marshal has been ordered to serve the Summons and First Amended Complaint as indicated on the Order Directing Service of Process by the Marshal. It is Further Ordered that Plaintiff must serve upon Defendants or, if appearance has been entered by counsel, upon their attorneys, a copy of every future pleading or other document submitted for consideration by the Court. (sp)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER Directing Service of Process of First Amended Complaint by the U.S. Marshal by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (sp)
|
| Filing 6 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Calvin D Jackson.(sp) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER Dismissing Complaint With Leave to Amend by Judge John F. Walter. The Complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. If Plaintiff still wishes to pursue this action, he is granted 30 days from the date of this Order within which to file a First Amended Complaint. While the Court does not, at this time, deem insufficient all of the Plaintiff's claims, the Court does require that any First Amended Complaint be complete in itself and not refer in any manner to any prior Complaint. The First Amended Complaint must identify clearly in the caption and the body of the pleading all Defendants whom Plaintiff intends to sue in this action. Plaintiff may not add defendants without leave of Court. Failure to file a First Amended Complaint may result in the dismissal of this action. (sp)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER Re Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick: granting #2 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee. It is Further Ordered that, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1915, the prisoner-plaintiff owes the Court the total filing fee of $350.00. Monthly payments shall be forwarded to the Court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). (sp)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and referred to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (esa) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Calvin D Jackson. (esa) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against defendants J. Buendia(Licensed Vocational Nurse, in official capacity), J. Buendia(Licensed Vocational Nurse, in individual capacity), Engels(Psychologist, in official capacity), Engels(Psychologist, in individual capacity), E. Jordan(Associate Warden, in individual capacity), E. Jordan(Associate Warden, in official capacity), D Ramos(Chief Medical Executive, in official capacity), D Ramos(Chief Medical Executive, in individual capacity), C Wu(Primary Care Physician, in individual capacity), C Wu(Primary Care Physician, in official capacity) pursuant to 42 USC 1983pr. Case assigned to Judge John F. Walter and referred to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick, filed by plaintiff Calvin D Jackson. (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
