Jose Estrada v. Deluna Investments, Inc., et al
| Jose Estrada |
| Deluna Investments, Inc.,, Baja Cabana, Inc. and Does 1-10 |
| 2:2019cv02329 |
| March 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Gail J Standish |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to F.R.CIV.P. 41 (a)(1)(A)(ii) filed by plaintiff Jose Estrada.(Carson, Chris) |
Filing 24
ORDER DENYING (VACATING DATES DUE TO SETTLEMENT) by Judge Percy Anderson, re Stipulation to Vacate #16 . (mrgo)
|
| Filing 23 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Jose Estradato Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Set/Reset Deadlines,, #17 OSC Response (Seabock, Christopher) |
| Filing 22 NOTICE of Association of Counsel associating attorney Christopher A. Seabock on behalf of Plaintiff Jose Estrada. Filed by Plaintiff Jose Estrada (Attorney Christopher A Seabock added to party Jose Estrada(pty:pla))(Seabock, Christopher) |
| Filing 21 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [FRCP 16, 26(f)] SCHEDULING CONFERENCE [FRCP 26(f)] by Judge Percy Anderson. Scheduling Conference set for July 22, 2019, at 10:30 a.m. (lom) |
| Filing 20 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendants Baja Cabana, Inc., Deluna Investments, Inc., (McClellan, Edson) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Baja Cabana, Inc., Deluna Investments, Inc.,, (McClellan, Edson) |
| Filing 18 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants Baja Cabana, Inc., Deluna Investments, Inc.,.(McClellan, Edson) |
|
Filing 17
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW RE: SANCTIONS by Judge Percy Anderson. The Court has advised the Center repeatedly that the proper procedure when a settlement was reached was to either file a dismissal of the action or to place the settlement on the record. The Court also advised counsel that these flawed Notices were not be filed and that any future filings would result in an Order to Show Cause re Sanctions. Accordingly, the Court orders the Center for Disability Access to show cause in writing why it should not be sanctioned $10,000.00 for filing the Joint Stipulation to Vacate Dates Due to Settlement. Counsel's written response is due on or before June 13, 2019. (mrgo)
|
| Filing 16 Joint STIPULATION to Vacate Dates Due to Settlement filed by plaintiff Jose Estrada. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Chris Carson added to party Jose Estrada(pty:pla))(Carson, Chris) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER DENIED #13 by Judge Percy Anderson. See document for details. (lom)
|
|
Filing 14
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Percy Anderson re: Notice of Settlement #13 . The Court has been advised by counsel that this matter has settled. The parties have ten (10) days from the date of this order or until the next scheduled court appearance, whichever is shorter, to file with the court a dismissal of the action or to appear, in-person or telephonically with their clients, to place the settlement on the record. (mrgo)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Settlement and Request to Vacate All Currently Set Dates filed by plaintiff Jose Estrada. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Carson, Chris) |
| Filing 12 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Baja Cabana, Inc. answer now due 6/7/2019; Deluna Investments, Inc., answer now due 6/7/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants Baja Cabana, Inc.; Deluna Investments, Inc.,.(Attorney Edson K McClellan added to party Baja Cabana, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Edson K McClellan added to party Deluna Investments, Inc.,(pty:dft))(McClellan, Edson) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jose Estrada, upon Defendant Deluna Investments, Inc., served on 4/21/2019, answer due 5/13/2019. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jose Estrada, upon Defendant Baja Cabana, Inc. served on 4/19/2019, answer due 5/10/2019. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (iv)
|
| Filing 8 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (kss) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Baja Cabana, Inc., Deluna Investments, Inc. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Jose Estrada. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Jose Estrada, (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Jose Estrada. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23454183 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Jose Estrada. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Jose Estrada(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
