Martin Vogel v. Fonecentral, Inc. et al
| Martin Vogel |
| Does 1-10, Fonecentral, Inc. and E.M. Pizza, Inc. |
| Roes and E.M. Pizza, Inc. business form unknown (as to Crossclaim Doc No. 12 filed doing business as Dominos Pizza |
| 2:2019cv02338 |
| March 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John E McDermott |
| Manuel L Real |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 26 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re First APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, #20 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Cutbirth, Robert) |
| Filing 25 Opposition re: First APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, #20 filed by Plaintiff Martin Vogel. (Carson, Chris) |
| Filing 24 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Chris Carson on behalf of Plaintiff Martin Vogel (Attorney Chris Carson added to party Martin Vogel(pty:pla))(Carson, Chris) |
| Filing 23 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan filed by Plaintiff Martin Vogel.. (Price, Dennis) |
| Filing 22 INITIAL DISCLOSURE filed by Defendant E.M. Pizza, Inc. (Cutbirth, Robert) |
| Filing 21 Answer to Cross-Claim ANSWER to Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), Crossclaim #12 filed by Cross-Defendant E.M. Pizza, Inc..(Cutbirth, Robert) |
| Filing 20 First APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by Defendant E.M. Pizza, Inc.. (Cutbirth, Robert) |
| Filing 19 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant E.M. Pizza, Inc..(Cutbirth, Robert) |
| Filing 18 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to E.M. Pizza, Inc. answer now due 6/23/2019, filed by Defendant / Cross-Defendant E.M. Pizza, Inc..(Cutbirth, Robert) |
Filing 17
ORDER by Judge Manuel L. Real: Granting #14 APPLICATION to Stay Case re Early Mediation ADA Disability Access Litigation as to FoneCentral, Inc. The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than 7/28/2019. (gk)
|
| Filing 16 First STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer/Response to Complaint filed by Defendant / Cross-Defendant E.M. Pizza, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Robert A Cutbirth added to party E.M. Pizza, Inc.(pty:crd), Attorney Robert A Cutbirth added to party E.M. Pizza, Inc.(pty:dft))(Cutbirth, Robert) |
| Filing 15 SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Defendant Fonecentral, Inc., upon Defendant E.M. Pizza, Inc. served on 5/17/2019, answer due 6/7/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Poon, Ricky) |
| Filing 14 APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by Defendant Fonecentral, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Poon, Ricky) |
| Filing 13 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant E.M. Pizza, Inc., identifying Martin Vogel; E.M. Pizza, Inc.. (Attorney Ricky W Poon added to party E.M. Pizza, Inc.(pty:dft))(Poon, Ricky) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , CROSSCLAIM against E.M. Pizza, Inc. filed by Defendant Fonecentral, Inc..(Attorney Ricky W Poon added to party Fonecentral, Inc.(pty:dft))(Poon, Ricky) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Martin Vogel, upon Defendant Fonecentral, Inc. served on 5/6/2019, answer due 5/28/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process: JULIAN CHUNYIN KUNG in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Martin Vogel, upon Defendant E.M. Pizza, Inc. served on 5/5/2019, answer due 5/28/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process: DAVID L SMITH in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR Re: Summons issued #6 . Summons issued without signature and seal. Attached to this notice is the replacement summons with signature and seal. (Attachments: #1 corrected summons) (esa) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (cch) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER RE: NOTICE TO COUNSEL upon filing of the complaint by Judge Manuel L. Real. READ CAREFULLY - FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY LEAD TO SANCTIONS. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (cch)
|
| Filing 6 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendants E.M. Pizza, Inc., Fonecentral, Inc. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Manuel L. Real and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (esa) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Martin Vogel. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Martin Vogel, (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Martin Vogel. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23455715 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Martin Vogel. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Martin Vogel(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
