Gail Willis v. Affinia Default Services, LLC et al
| Gail Willis |
| Affinia Default Services, LLC, NBS Default Services, LLC, Cal-Western Reconveyance, LLC, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Does 1 through 25 inclusive and Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, fka World Savings Bank, FSB |
| 2:2019cv02440 |
| April 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| Otis D Wright |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1444 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 REPLY in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint #9 filed by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Reeves, Dean) |
| Filing 12 The hearing on the MOTION TO DISMISS #9 , scheduled for May 13, 2019 at 1:30 P.M., is hereby VACATED and taken off calendar. No appearances are necessary. The matter stands submitted, and will be decided upon without oral argument. An order will issue. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sce) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 13 OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT, WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. 'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF 'S COMPLAINT #9 filed by Plaintiff Gail Willis. (lc) |
Filing 11
SELF-REPRESENTATION ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (lc)
|
| Filing 10 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint #9 filed by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Reeves, Dean) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint filed by defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. Motion set for hearing on 5/13/2019 at 01:30 PM before Judge Otis D. Wright II. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Reeves, Dean) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 19-03-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:18-cv-02800 ODW(SKx). Case transferred from Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm to Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-02440 ODW(SKx). Signed by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (rn)
|
|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Affinia Default Services, LLC, Cal-Western Reconveyance, LLC, Does 1 through 25, NBS Default Services, LLC, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Gail Willis. #1 [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 2/11/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL] (lh) |
| Filing 4 JOINDER filed by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. joining in Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . (Reeves, Dean) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., identifying Wells Fargo & Co.. (Reeves, Dean) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Reeves, Dean) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, Central District, case number 19STCV04754 Receipt No: 0973-23472776 - Fee: $400, filed by defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-I to Notice of Removal by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.) (Attorney Dean A Reeves added to party Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.(pty:dft))(Reeves, Dean) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
