Roy Yiun v. Soo Mi Kim et al
| Roy Yiun |
| Does 1 through 10, Soo Mi Kim, Lee Family Trust and Soo Mi Kim doing business as Coin Op Laundry |
| 2:2019cv02522 |
| April 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F Eick |
| Manuel L Real |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (cch) |
Filing 7
ORDER RE: NOTICE TO COUNSEL upon filing of the complaint by Judge Manuel L. Real. READ CAREFULLY - FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY LEAD TO SANCTIONS. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (cch)
|
| Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Soo Mi Kim, Lee Family Trust. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Manuel L. Real and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff ROY YIUN, (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff ROY YIUN. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff ROY YIUN. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23491511 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff ROY YIUN. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party ROY YIUN(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
