Liberty City Movie, LLC et al v. U.S. Bank National Association
Plaintiff: Liberty City Movie, LLC and Cutting Edge Stereoscope Motion Pictures, LLC
Defendant: U.S. Bank National Association, a national banking association and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2019cv02582
Filed: April 4, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dean D Pregerson
Referring Judge: Suzanne H Segal
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 1, 2019 Filing 23 MINUTES OF MOTION TO DISMISS CASE FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED #20 held before Judge Dean D. Pregerson: Court hears oral argument and takes the matter under submission. Court Reporter: Debbie Hino-Spaan. (shb)
June 17, 2019 Filing 22 REPLY IN SUPPORT OF NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted #20 filed by Defendant U.S. Bank National Association, a national banking association. (Zubairi, Faisal)
June 11, 2019 Filing 21 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted #20 filed by Plaintiffs Cutting Edge Stereoscope Motion Pictures, LLC, Liberty City Movie, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1)(Blessing, William)
May 31, 2019 Filing 20 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted filed by Defendant U.S. Bank National Association, a national banking association. Motion set for hearing on 7/1/2019 at 10:00 AM before Judge Dean D. Pregerson. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted, #2 Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted, #3 Exhibits 1-4 to Request for Judicial Notice, #4 Exhibit 5 to Request for Judicial Notice, #5 Exhibits 6-7 to Request for Judicial Notice, #6 Exhibit 8 to Request for Judicial Notice, #7 Exhibits 9-18 to Request for Judicial Notice, #8 Exhibit 19 to Request for Judicial Notice, #9 Exhibits 20-24 to Request for Judical Notice, #10 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted) (Zubairi, Faisal)
May 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: GRANTING #4 , #6 , [15} Non-Resident Attorney William H. Blessing APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Liberty City Movie LLC and Cutting Edge Stereoscope Motion Pictures LLC, designating James R Balesh as local counsel. (shb)
May 8, 2019 Filing 18 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant U.S. Bank National Association, a national banking association. Related Case(s): Central District of California, Case No. 2:17CV06991DDPSS; Central District of California, Case No. 2:14CV5593DDPSS; U.S. Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit, Case No. 1555370; Court of Common Pleas, Hamilton County, Ohio, Case No. A1804429; Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. BS 144980; and Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. BC 538164 (Zubairi, Faisal)
April 25, 2019 Filing 17 First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to U.S. Bank National Association, a national banking association answer now due 6/3/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #14 filed by Defendant U.S. Bank National Association, a national banking association.(Attorney Faisal M Zubairi added to party U.S. Bank National Association, a national banking association(pty:dft))(Zubairi, Faisal)
April 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Dean D. Pregerson. Counsel are encouraged to review the Central District's website for additional information. See document for specifics. (lom)
April 24, 2019 Filing 15 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney William H. Blessing to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Cutting Edge Stereoscope Motion Pictures, LLC, Liberty City Movie, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Previously Paid on 4/4/2019, Receipt No. 0973-23500985) filed by Plaintiffs Cutting Edge Stereoscope Motion Pictures, LLC, Liberty City Movie, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order to Appeal Pro Hac Vice) (Balesh, James)
April 23, 2019 Filing 14 COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid (400 paid on 04/04/2019, receipt number 0973-23500379), filed by Plaintiffs Liberty City Movie, LLC, Cutting Edge Stereoscope Motion Pictures, LLC.(Balesh, James)
April 23, 2019 Filing 13 NOTICE of Errata filed by Plaintiffs Cutting Edge Stereoscope Motion Pictures, LLC, Liberty City Movie, LLC. (Balesh, James)
April 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 19-03-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:14-cv-05593 DDP(SSx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg and Judge John F. Walter to Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-02582 DDP(SSx). Signed by Judge Dean D. Pregerson (rn)
April 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (lom)
April 8, 2019 Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant U.S. Bank National Association, a national banking association. (jtil)
April 5, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney William H. Blessing to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Movants Cutting Edge Stereoscope Motion Pictures, LLC, Liberty City Movie, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-23500985) #4 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(d) Certificate of Good Standing not attached for every state court listed to which the applicant has been admitted. Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(b) Proposed order not attached. (lt)
April 5, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil)
April 5, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (jtil)
April 4, 2019 Filing 6 APPLICATION for Order for on Application of Non-Resident Attorney William H. Blessing filed by Plaintiffs Cutting Edge Stereoscope Motion Pictures, LLC, Liberty City Movie, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order on Application of Non-Resident Attorney) (Balesh, James)
April 4, 2019 Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Cutting Edge Stereoscope Motion Pictures, LLC, Liberty City Movie, LLC. (Balesh, James)
April 4, 2019 Filing 4 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney William H. Blessing to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Movants Cutting Edge Stereoscope Motion Pictures, LLC, Liberty City Movie, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-23500985) filed by Plaintiffs Cutting Edge Stereoscope Motion Pictures, LLC, Liberty City Movie, LLC. (Balesh, James)
April 4, 2019 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Cutting Edge Stereoscope Motion Pictures, LLC, Liberty City Movie, LLC, (Balesh, James)
April 4, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movants Cutting Edge Stereoscope Motion Pictures, LLC, Liberty City Movie, LLC. (Balesh, James)
April 4, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23500379 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs Liberty City Movie, LLC, Cutting Edge Stereoscope Motion Pictures, LLC. (Attorney James R Balesh added to party Cutting Edge Stereoscope Motion Pictures, LLC(pty:bkmov), Attorney James R Balesh added to party Liberty City Movie, LLC(pty:bkmov))(Balesh, James)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Liberty City Movie, LLC et al v. U.S. Bank National Association
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Liberty City Movie, LLC
Represented By: James R Balesh
Represented By: William H Blessing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cutting Edge Stereoscope Motion Pictures, LLC
Represented By: James R Balesh
Represented By: William H Blessing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Bank National Association, a national banking association
Represented By: Faisal M Zubairi
Represented By: Lynnda A McGlinn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1 through 100, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?