BE Labs, Inc. v. Tenda Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: BE Labs, Inc.
Defendant: Tenda Technology, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2019cv02639
Filed: April 6, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John A Kronstadt
Referring Judge: Alka Sagar
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER RE SECOND STIPULATION FOR 30-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND(DKT. 17) by Judge John A. Kronstadt. The Court APPROVES the Second Stipulation. Defendant Tenda Technology, Inc. shall have until July 17, 2019 to respond to the initial Complaint. There will be no further continuances granted absent compelling circumstances that could have not been otherwise foreseen. (shb)
June 11, 2019 Filing 17 Second STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Tenda Technology, Inc. answer now due 7/17/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Tenda Technology, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Benson, Robert)
June 11, 2019 Filing 16 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Johannes S Hsu counsel for Defendant Tenda Technology, Inc.. Adding Johannes Hsu as counsel of record for Tenda Technology, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Tenda Technology, Inc.. (Attorney Johannes S Hsu added to party Tenda Technology, Inc.(pty:dft))(Hsu, Johannes)
June 11, 2019 Filing 15 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Robert J Benson counsel for Defendant Tenda Technology, Inc.. Adding Robert Benson as counsel of record for Tenda Technology, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Tenda Technology, Inc.. (Attorney Robert J Benson added to party Tenda Technology, Inc.(pty:dft))(Benson, Robert)
June 3, 2019 Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Tenda Technology, Inc. answer now due 6/17/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff BE Labs, Inc..(Corcoran, Peter)
May 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER: by Judge John A. Kronstadt, ORDERING Response for Tenda AC5 Patent Infringement submitted by Defendant Tenda Technology, Inc. received on 5/15/2019 is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: Local Rule 11-3.8: Lacking name, address, phone, facsimile numbers, and e-mail address. The Clerk shall return the documents to the sender at the return address attached. All documents filed with this Court shall have a title, Caption page pursuant to L. R. 11-3.8. (shb)
April 26, 2019 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff BE Labs, Inc., upon Defendant Tenda Technology, Inc. served on 4/25/2019, answer due 5/16/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Refused to give name or title in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Corcoran, Peter)
April 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO Local Rule 83-1.3.1 and General Order 19-03 -Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2;19-cv-02636 JAK(ASx). Case referred from Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar for Discovery. The case number will now read as follows: 2:19-cv-02639 JAK(ASx). Signed by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (rn)
April 10, 2019 Filing 10 STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT. (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER SPECIFICS). (jp)
April 9, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Isaac Rabicoff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (lh)
April 9, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments No. 5 Civil Cover Sheet should not have been attached to Docket Entry No.1. Each document should have been filed separately. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs. (lh)
April 9, 2019 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Tenda Technology, Inc. (lh)
April 9, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
April 9, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. (lh)
April 9, 2019 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff BE Labs, Inc.. (Corcoran, Peter)
April 9, 2019 Filing 3 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by BE Labs, Inc.. (Corcoran, Peter)
April 9, 2019 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AND NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES filed by Plaintiff BE Labs, Inc. (Corcoran, Peter)
April 6, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23508734 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff BE Labs, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - 581 Patent, #2 Exhibit Ex. B - 183 Patent.pdf, #3 Exhibit Ex. C - 581 Chart Tenda, #4 Exhibit Ex. D - 183 Chart Tenda, #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Peter J Corcoran, III added to party BE Labs, Inc.(pty:pla))(Corcoran, Peter)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BE Labs, Inc. v. Tenda Technology, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BE Labs, Inc.
Represented By: Peter J Corcoran, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tenda Technology, Inc.
Represented By: Robert J Benson
Represented By: Johannes S Hsu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?