Chris Langer v. Norman R. Nadel et al
| Chris Langer |
| Does 1-10, Norman R. Nadel, Jeffrey H. Nadel and The J. Nadel Family Limited Partnership |
| 2:2019cv02679 |
| April 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael R Wilner |
| George H Wu |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER #14 by Judge George H. Wu. The Court sets an Order to Show re: Settlement Hearing for August 15, 2019 at 8:30 a.m. The parties are advised the hearing will be vacated, and no appearance will be required provided a stipulation to dismiss, is filed by noon on August 14, 2019. (lom)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Settlement filed by plaintiff Chris Langer. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Carson, Chris) |
| Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to The J. Nadel Family Limited Partnership answer now due 6/28/2019, filed by Attorney for Defendant The J. Nadel Family Limited Partnership.(Correia, Michael) |
| Filing 12 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Jeffrey H. Nadel answer now due 6/12/2019; Norman R. Nadel answer now due 6/12/2019, filed by Attorney for Defendant Jeffrey H. Nadel; Norman R. Nadel.(Attorney Michael Allen Correia added to party Jeffrey H. Nadel(pty:dft), Attorney Michael Allen Correia added to party Norman R. Nadel(pty:dft))(Correia, Michael) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Chris Langer, upon Defendant The J. Nadel Family Limited Partnership served on 5/9/2019, answer due 5/30/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jeffrey H. Nadel - Co - Defendant in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Chris Langer, upon Defendant Jeffrey H. Nadel served on 4/28/2019, answer due 5/20/2019. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Chris Langer, upon Defendant Norman R. Nadel served on 4/22/2019, answer due 5/13/2019. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
|
Filing 8
Standing Order Re Final Pre-Trial Conferences for Civil Jury Trials Before Judge George H. Wu by Judge George H. Wu. (See document for details) (mrgo)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Jeffrey H. Nadel, Norman R. Nadel, The J. Nadel Family Limited Partnership. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Chris Langer. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Chris Langer, (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Chris Langer. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23517394 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Chris Langer. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Chris Langer(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
