Allen Hammler v. Dejiney Jones et al
| Allen Hammler |
| D. Umphenour and Dejiney Jones |
| 2:2019cv02831 |
| April 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jesus G Bernal |
| Sheri Pym |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Reconsider re Order Dismissing Case #5 filed by Plaintiff Allen Hammler. (sbou) |
Filing 5
ORDER OF DISMISSAL OR REMAND by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. Accordingly, this case is HEREBY ORDERED DISMISSED. No further filings shall be accepted under this case number. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (twdb)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER by Judge Jesus G. Bernal: Denying #2 Notice of Filing Complaint Without Prepayment of Filing Fees or APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (CV-93). DENIED, with leave to amend within 30 days. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. (twdb)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (jtil) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING OF COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES OR REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (CV-93) (jtil) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Allen Hammler against Defendants Dejiney Jones and D. Umphenour, pursuant to 42 USC 1983. Case assigned to Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
