Juan Garibay v. Biopharma Research LP, et al
Juan Garibay |
Does 1-10 and Biopharma Research LP |
2:2019cv02868 |
April 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John A Kronstadt |
Suzanne H Segal |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT (DKT. #13 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Court has considered the matters raised with respect to Plaintiff's Application for Default Judgment (the "Application") (Dkt. #13 ) and has concluded that pursuant to Local Rule 7-15, the matters may be decided without oral argument. The Application, noticed for hearing on July 22, 2019, is hereby taken UNDER SUBMISSION and off the Court's motion calendar. No appearance by counsel is necessary.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jaklc3) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 13 APPLICATION for Default Judgment against Defendant Biopharma Research LP filed by Plaintiff Juan Garibay. Application set for hearing on 7/22/2019 at 08:30 AM before Judge John A. Kronstadt. (Attachments: #1 PNA, #2 Exhibit List, #3 Proposed Order, #4 Exhibit 1, #5 Exhibit 2, #6 Exhibit 3, #7 Exhibit 4, #8 Exhibit 5, #9 Proof of Service) (Price, Dennis) |
Filing 12 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER SETTING HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT by Judge John A Kronstadt: On May 31, 2019, default was entered against Defendant. The Court sets the hearing on the motion for default judgment for July 22, 2019 at 8:30 am, which shall be served on Defendant and filed with the Court no later than June 17, 2019. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ake) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 11 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Biopharma Research LP, a California Limited Partnership (shb) |
Filing 10 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Biopharma Research LP filed by Plaintiff Juan Garibay. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proof of Service) (Grace, Phyl) |
Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Juan Garibay, upon Defendant Biopharma Research LP served on 5/4/2019, answer due 5/28/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon John Doe - Person in charge /Authorized in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 8 STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. See order for further details. (shb) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Biopharma Research LP. (esa) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. (esa) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Juan Garibay. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Juan Garibay, (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Juan Garibay. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23547929 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Juan Garibay. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Juan Garibay(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.