David Lauridsen v. Dr. Bonnheim et al
Plaintiff: David Lauridsen
Defendant: Dr. John Doe, Dr. Bonnheim and Dr. Luk
Case Number: 2:2019cv02895
Filed: April 15, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John A Kronstadt
Referring Judge: Alexander F MacKinnon
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER RE CIVIL RIGHTS CASE AND PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. Until the First Amended Complaint has been screened and the Court has ordered that service of process may occur, plaintiff may not proceed with service of process upon defendant(s). (See document for details.) (sbou)
June 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Luk; Party John Doe (official capacity ), John Doe (individual ), Bonnheim (M.D., individual ) and Bonnheim (M.D., official capacity ) terminated amending Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights) #1 , filed by Plaintiff David Lauridsen. (sbou)
June 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): Order Denying as Moot Plaintiff's Motion re Documents and Request for Extension (Filed May 17, 2019; EcF No. #6 ) by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. Plaintiffs request that his documents be filed and for a 10-day extension to file his IFP request is denied as moot. (See order for details) (et)
May 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. If plaintiff desires to pursue this action, he is ORDERED to file a First Amended Complaint no later than June 28, 2019 (See document for details.) (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1, #2 Attachment 2) (sbou)
May 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. Granting #7 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee. It is further ORDERED that the prisoner-plaintiff owes the Court the initial filing fee of $350.00. An initial partial filing fee of $2.93 must be paid within 30 days of the date of this order. Thereafter, monthly payments shall be forwarded to the Court in accordance with this order. (et)
May 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff David Lauridsen. (et)
May 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION Requesting to file all remaining documents via u.s. mail and MOTION requesting 10 day extension to file forma pauperis request filed by Plaintiff David Lauridsen. (et)
April 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER RE CIVIL RIGHTS CASE by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. Please be advised that the Court and the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation ("CDCR") are participants in a pilot project that requires all documents submitted by inmates at your institution in cases such as this to be scanned and submitted to the court by electronic mail. General Order 1802. (See document for details.) (sbou)
April 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MINUTES (In Chambers): Plaintiff's Complaint by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. Plaintiff is ORDERED, on or before May 17, 2019, to submit the filing fee of $400.00, or submit a Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis With Declaration in Support, Prisoner Authorization and a certified copy of your institutional trust account statement for the last six months. (See document for details.) (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1) (sbou)
April 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and referred to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (car)
April 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING OF COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES OR REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (CV-93) filed by plaintiff David Lauridsen. (car)
April 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants pursuant to 42 USC 1983. Case assigned to Judge John A. Kronstadt and referred to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon, filed by plaintiff David Lauridsen. (car)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: David Lauridsen v. Dr. Bonnheim et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Lauridsen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dr. John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dr. Bonnheim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dr. Luk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?